From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603FBC2C6 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2025 13:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741959043; cv=none; b=M3UoiDTjnpk/GMevMxJ2BTLRah98lCN5yAFd1aGRPRTXE08wl8M3x4d21Y1sDhCaooPNQ9fFePFdbteW/1AnklorDr6Ijy+IW5bgj+J3tGvqdu7lwpUaTaVIkIgcFIzX6+FYnTE5TgQyYKVBIfKVQWnwiCVJDGAB11RlfwOWw/U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741959043; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PoZkHOWVA3pj2hoW/Ga3qJPBJ42cLzuUlRVqwtswjhY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=efwoLZOpawZLC+0EyGZ7RMPsF34WSw5cEoIQzCUMr4qMzVVCJG8OY1vpFfw7yJGLxjnpWkHVLyzb4kux6MDzo0me454U3gyFdunt1JelYDsWXm9GzMT1voT2pN/qmcVzsl4xQuRSRaCQkHLPNBTDP6QLyF8y0oHYF/gkBlrMHe4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=BZa9Wj3w; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=RL82pk/h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="BZa9Wj3w"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="RL82pk/h" Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:30:39 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1741959040; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6zrsZx9dzcC/hKFpnqik0KP6zc1r2uYMfmMqOv6gtfE=; b=BZa9Wj3wfB00AcsnhFX3Myy+NKRAb9i9qOujXwm028vQ3EzvAe10gyyL5BDlqzB118jSo7 KXhTZ2Z/gITfbkXyZoPaY/UI2V1GO+zuruMppk/+7xYCorO8RgNIw5MkN9koPfbTPntJsb fKnqc1Cb8kDhHPEvLrkSQB5AfVcAvJEnOiwAfLn+QOc0jM6+kX41TBv+StG+3Xql3nkRxB WP5CmjtX5sJGwl3YunMMtaJzxce2fEkKpnGtEUzYHIt4UUfGi0p6x5NK6O36ia61kVQMpS aQpPrFjCrxCb378nnfFX0gbSNPD+wmA9bVm/RGKzw+vszydITiK4Hdnbj4/ppg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1741959040; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6zrsZx9dzcC/hKFpnqik0KP6zc1r2uYMfmMqOv6gtfE=; b=RL82pk/hgcWTrkD1JZXLqtba2ylreI7a/3dWEkUlz0pXQ5Uyox2LSPNLUxeC8HEXp7O5Dn EMqfG6zZrkMlDiDg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Almeida , Darren Hart , Davidlohr Bueso , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Thomas Gleixner , Valentin Schneider , Waiman Long , Paul McKenney Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/21] futex: Add support task local hash maps, FUTEX2_NUMA and FUTEX2_MPOL Message-ID: <20250314133039.GYPBdpep@linutronix.de> References: <20250312151634.2183278-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20250312151848.RlB_XuHA@linutronix.de> <20250314105856.GB36322@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250314112808.-XVssA31@linutronix.de> <20250314114102.GY5880@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250314120057.NcjcFp3K@linutronix.de> <20250314123058.GZ5880@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250314123058.GZ5880@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> On 2025-03-14 13:30:58 [+0100], Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Yeah, but sparse is stupid. > > > > I though we like sparse. > > I always ignore it, too much noise. What do you suggest? Cleaning up that noise that noise or moving that RCU checking towards other tooling which is restricted to RCU only? Knowing you, you have already a plan in your cupboard but not the time :) Sebastian