From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,jglisse@redhat.com,jgg@nvidia.com,apopple@nvidia.com,david@redhat.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-memory-document-restore_exclusive_pte.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:14:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250317051446.379ABC4CEEC@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4136 bytes --]
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/memory: document restore_exclusive_pte()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memory-document-restore_exclusive_pte.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/memory: document restore_exclusive_pte()
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:22:56 +0100
Let's document how this function is to be used, and why the folio lock is
involved.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250226132257.2826043-5-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memory.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-memory-document-restore_exclusive_pte
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -716,6 +716,32 @@ struct folio *vm_normal_folio_pmd(struct
}
#endif
+/**
+ * restore_exclusive_pte - Restore a device-exclusive entry
+ * @vma: VMA covering @address
+ * @folio: the mapped folio
+ * @page: the mapped folio page
+ * @address: the virtual address
+ * @ptep: pte pointer into the locked page table mapping the folio page
+ * @orig_pte: pte value at @ptep
+ *
+ * Restore a device-exclusive non-swap entry to an ordinary present pte.
+ *
+ * The folio and the page table must be locked, and MMU notifiers must have
+ * been called to invalidate any (exclusive) device mappings.
+ *
+ * Locking the folio makes sure that anybody who just converted the pte to
+ * a device-exclusive entry can map it into the device to make forward
+ * progress without others converting it back until the folio was unlocked.
+ *
+ * If the folio lock ever becomes an issue, we can stop relying on the folio
+ * lock; it might make some scenarios with heavy thrashing less likely to
+ * make forward progress, but these scenarios might not be valid use cases.
+ *
+ * Note that the folio lock does not protect against all cases of concurrent
+ * page table modifications (e.g., MADV_DONTNEED, mprotect), so device drivers
+ * must use MMU notifiers to sync against any concurrent changes.
+ */
static void restore_exclusive_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct folio *folio, struct page *page, unsigned long address,
pte_t *ptep, pte_t orig_pte)
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are
mm-factor-out-large-folio-handling-from-folio_order-into-folio_large_order.patch
mm-factor-out-large-folio-handling-from-folio_nr_pages-into-folio_large_nr_pages.patch
mm-let-_folio_nr_pages-overlay-memcg_data-in-first-tail-page.patch
mm-let-_folio_nr_pages-overlay-memcg_data-in-first-tail-page-fix.patch
mm-move-hugetlb-specific-things-in-folio-to-page.patch
mm-move-_pincount-in-folio-to-page-on-32bit.patch
mm-move-_entire_mapcount-in-folio-to-page-on-32bit.patch
mm-rmap-pass-dst_vma-to-folio_dup_file_rmap_pte-and-friends.patch
mm-rmap-pass-vma-to-__folio_add_rmap.patch
mm-rmap-abstract-large-mapcount-operations-for-large-folios-hugetlb.patch
bit_spinlock-__always_inline-unlock-functions.patch
mm-rmap-use-folio_large_nr_pages-in-add-remove-functions.patch
mm-rmap-basic-mm-owner-tracking-for-large-folios-hugetlb.patch
mm-copy-on-write-cow-reuse-support-for-pte-mapped-thp.patch
mm-convert-folio_likely_mapped_shared-to-folio_maybe_mapped_shared.patch
mm-config_no_page_mapcount-to-prepare-for-not-maintain-per-page-mapcounts-in-large-folios.patch
fs-proc-page-remove-per-page-mapcount-dependency-for-proc-kpagecount-config_no_page_mapcount.patch
fs-proc-task_mmu-remove-per-page-mapcount-dependency-for-pm_mmap_exclusive-config_no_page_mapcount.patch
fs-proc-task_mmu-remove-per-page-mapcount-dependency-for-mapmax-config_no_page_mapcount.patch
fs-proc-task_mmu-remove-per-page-mapcount-dependency-for-smaps-smaps_rollup-config_no_page_mapcount.patch
mm-stop-maintaining-the-per-page-mapcount-of-large-folios-config_no_page_mapcount.patch
reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250317051446.379ABC4CEEC@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.