From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43A06203714 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 10:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742726040; cv=none; b=r12sXoJrWVhu2gU7hHLLC0GUOuJ5sxno5eN3UyC01TqexYmV5dCWyXETs22WlAm/FolmrXECpAXXNFBstGK95A05FJStOo9HZmjBUqFxCUiBFbWMj8dXLVShpaqPDwA7jrK9PplPaYOsVhtr8Lnu3VjlFwZh17RlnqbHVSqDjcE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742726040; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GO2wdXrNPwEnpCN/dm5FDzfFQZbTCOavrxttmHtx0i8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=MPxFxmZccsg/PW/Hr/jRjOSlDQFR/NJ6v0wVQ138xbOw6dmiph6BfJ6ijIMbeaUnbWR0oumuvVD8QYp6A+1k0KCTh1CiLZNTpE5wjLFLq8zAPCsEgDf50I5eVMDnDQN5/qamLc7tWvf/1yf1s13416HkfYEHu7cY+yN7Uz5qxTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gXf2jfCu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gXf2jfCu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1742726038; x=1774262038; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=GO2wdXrNPwEnpCN/dm5FDzfFQZbTCOavrxttmHtx0i8=; b=gXf2jfCuXOuULGKK8+ZeEf99hDsRJIo3wrvLgCkFhqv7+BLwc3o/IPcA vKGcm0oHIsA5JUbjrztiMIU/4whXcMCBPV8DKqlu09jhEOKN3KGBF+aJv A/HwMYp5MxB7pT0pYIzo0qM9aLE3WuRiifEDvPiI0zkfs0wdVnBrSc0QV oOEuJWAHgdno8tr5RhGV49BDBX5xPvsaInfnxnX+w+vfDJwgeRvwabvAb Sd6tZAf4BwoDfQWSRSzbvtxdqFr/zJxX4Me/WSCxGYWMhXqGIVBW6x0JK +xImx/AHMKvKWnEUKdGck0I0sGMlZWFCU9OO7g/WFM34UpSV09FMd1Whk w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZMUQ1iwOTzqhoC4Cmqidqw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NZkWDjbIREufgGS3ZajVGw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11381"; a="44052328" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,269,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="44052328" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Mar 2025 03:33:58 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EjvZ8jEZToWXW1rU2unyYA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: yB9qrIIAQBqgotnVTIhALg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,269,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="123959134" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO e98e3655d6d2) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2025 03:33:56 -0700 Received: from kbuild by e98e3655d6d2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1twIeQ-0002iB-0b; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 10:33:54 +0000 Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:33:23 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) is wrong, expected 3" Message-ID: <202503231821.9gzWIqqd-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Darrick, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 586de92313fcab8ed84ac5f78f4d2aae2db92c59 commit: 13877bc79d81354c53e91f3c86ac0f7bafe3ba7b xfs: port ondisk structure checks from xfs/122 to the kernel date: 5 months ago config: arm-randconfig-r051-20250323 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250323/202503231821.9gzWIqqd-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250323/202503231821.9gzWIqqd-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503231821.9gzWIqqd-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/container_of.h:5:0, from include/linux/list.h:5, from include/linux/semaphore.h:11, from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:24, from fs/xfs/xfs.h:26, from fs/xfs/xfs_super.c:7: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h: In function 'xfs_check_ondisk_structs': >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) is wrong, expected 3" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) ^ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:2: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:133:2: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry, 3); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_dir2_data_unused) is wrong, expected 6" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) ^ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:2: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_dir2_data_unused, 6); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +78 include/linux/build_bug.h bc6245e5efd70c Ian Abbott 2017-07-10 60 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 61 /** 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 62 * static_assert - check integer constant expression at build time 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 63 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 64 * static_assert() is a wrapper for the C11 _Static_assert, with a 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 65 * little macro magic to make the message optional (defaulting to the 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 66 * stringification of the tested expression). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 67 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 68 * Contrary to BUILD_BUG_ON(), static_assert() can be used at global 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 69 * scope, but requires the expression to be an integer constant 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 70 * expression (i.e., it is not enough that __builtin_constant_p() is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 71 * true for expr). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 72 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 73 * Also note that BUILD_BUG_ON() fails the build if the condition is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 74 * true, while static_assert() fails the build if the expression is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 75 * false. 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 76 */ 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 77 #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 @78 #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 79 07a368b3f55a79 Maxim Levitsky 2022-10-25 80 :::::: The code at line 78 was first introduced by commit :::::: 6bab69c65013bed5fce9f101a64a84d0385b3946 build_bug.h: add wrapper for _Static_assert :::::: TO: Rasmus Villemoes :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki