From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: broonie@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,joey.gouly@arm.com,kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,mark.rutland@arm.com,maz@kernel.org,oliver.upton@linux.dev,suzuki.poulose@arm.com,tabba@google.com,will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:59:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025032405-dizzy-promotion-0062@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321-stable-sve-6-12-v2-4-417ca2278d18@kernel.org>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN
to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.zen.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From broonie@kernel.org Thu Mar 20 17:13:41 2025
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:13:00 +0000
Subject: KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Message-ID: <20250321-stable-sve-6-12-v2-4-417ca2278d18@kernel.org>
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
[ Upstream commit 459f059be702056d91537b99a129994aa6ccdd35 ]
When KVM is in VHE mode, the host kernel tries to save and restore the
configuration of CPACR_EL1.ZEN (i.e. CPTR_EL2.ZEN when HCR_EL2.E2H=1)
across kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp() and kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(), since the
configuration may be clobbered by hyp when running a vCPU. This logic is
currently redundant.
The VHE hyp code unconditionally configures CPTR_EL2.ZEN to 0b01 when
returning to the host, permitting host kernel usage of SVE.
Now that the host eagerly saves and unbinds its own FPSIMD/SVE/SME
state, there's no need to save/restore the state of the EL0 SVE trap.
The kernel can safely save/restore state without trapping, as described
above, and will restore userspace state (including trap controls) before
returning to userspace.
Remove the redundant logic.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210195226.1215254-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
[Rework for refactoring of where the flags are stored -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 --
arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 16 ----------------
2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -891,8 +891,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
/* Save TRBE context if active */
#define DEBUG_STATE_SAVE_TRBE __vcpu_single_flag(iflags, BIT(6))
-/* SVE enabled for host EL0 */
-#define HOST_SVE_ENABLED __vcpu_single_flag(sflags, BIT(0))
/* SME enabled for EL0 */
#define HOST_SME_ENABLED __vcpu_single_flag(sflags, BIT(1))
/* Physical CPU not in supported_cpus */
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
@@ -65,10 +65,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vc
fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state();
*host_data_ptr(fp_owner) = FP_STATE_FREE;
- vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED);
- if (read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN)
- vcpu_set_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED);
-
if (system_supports_sme()) {
vcpu_clear_flag(vcpu, HOST_SME_ENABLED);
if (read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) & CPACR_EL1_SMEN_EL0EN)
@@ -202,18 +198,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcp
* when needed.
*/
fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state();
- } else if (has_vhe() && system_supports_sve()) {
- /*
- * The FPSIMD/SVE state in the CPU has not been touched, and we
- * have SVE (and VHE): CPACR_EL1 (alias CPTR_EL2) has been
- * reset by kvm_reset_cptr_el2() in the Hyp code, disabling SVE
- * for EL0. To avoid spurious traps, restore the trap state
- * seen by kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp():
- */
- if (vcpu_get_flag(vcpu, HOST_SVE_ENABLED))
- sysreg_clear_set(CPACR_EL1, 0, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN);
- else
- sysreg_clear_set(CPACR_EL1, CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN, 0);
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from broonie@kernel.org are
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch
queue-6.12/regulator-check-that-dummy-regulator-has-been-probed-before-using-it.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-eagerly-switch-zcr_el-1-2.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-mark-some-header-functions-as-inline.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-remove-host-fpsimd-saving-for-non-protected-kvm.patch
queue-6.12/regulator-dummy-force-synchronous-probing.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-refactor-exit-handlers.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-unconditionally-save-flush-host-fpsimd-sve-sme-state.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.smen.patch
queue-6.12/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.zen.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 0:12 [PATCH 6.12 v2 0/8] KVM: arm64: Backport of SVE fixes to v6.12 Mark Brown
2025-03-21 0:12 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 1/8] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:28 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:12 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 2/8] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:27 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:12 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 3/8] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM Mark Brown
2025-03-21 0:15 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-21 0:21 ` Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:26 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 4/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:26 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` gregkh [this message]
2025-03-21 0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 5/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:29 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 6/8] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:25 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 7/8] KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:27 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:13 ` [PATCH 6.12 v2 8/8] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:29 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:59 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2}" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025032405-dizzy-promotion-0062@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.