From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: broonie@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,joey.gouly@arm.com,kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,mark.rutland@arm.com,maz@kernel.org,oliver.upton@linux.dev,suzuki.poulose@arm.com,tabba@google.com,will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 11:56:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025032428-uncivil-amplify-e3cb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250321-stable-sve-6-13-v2-6-3150e3370c40@kernel.org>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers
to the 6.13-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
kvm-arm64-refactor-exit-handlers.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.13 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-125703-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 20 17:12:07 2025
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 00:10:15 +0000
Subject: KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Message-ID: <20250321-stable-sve-6-13-v2-6-3150e3370c40@kernel.org>
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
[ Upstream commit 9b66195063c5a145843547b1d692bd189be85287 ]
The hyp exit handling logic is largely shared between VHE and nVHE/hVHE,
with common logic in arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h. The code
in the header depends on function definitions provided by
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c and arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
when they include the header.
This is an unusual header dependency, and prevents the use of
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h in other files as this would
result in compiler warnings regarding missing definitions, e.g.
| In file included from arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c:8:
| ./arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h:733:31: warning: 'kvm_get_exit_handler_array' used but never defined
| 733 | static const exit_handler_fn *kvm_get_exit_handler_array(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ./arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h:735:13: warning: 'early_exit_filter' used but never defined
| 735 | static void early_exit_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code);
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Refactor the logic such that the header doesn't depend on anything from
the C files. There should be no functional change as a result of this
patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210195226.1215254-7-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h | 30 ++++++------------------------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c | 9 ++++-----
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h
@@ -666,23 +666,16 @@ static bool kvm_hyp_handle_dabt_low(stru
typedef bool (*exit_handler_fn)(struct kvm_vcpu *, u64 *);
-static const exit_handler_fn *kvm_get_exit_handler_array(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-
-static void early_exit_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code);
-
/*
* Allow the hypervisor to handle the exit with an exit handler if it has one.
*
* Returns true if the hypervisor handled the exit, and control should go back
* to the guest, or false if it hasn't.
*/
-static inline bool kvm_hyp_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+static inline bool kvm_hyp_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code,
+ const exit_handler_fn *handlers)
{
- const exit_handler_fn *handlers = kvm_get_exit_handler_array(vcpu);
- exit_handler_fn fn;
-
- fn = handlers[kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu)];
-
+ exit_handler_fn fn = handlers[kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu)];
if (fn)
return fn(vcpu, exit_code);
@@ -712,20 +705,9 @@ static inline void synchronize_vcpu_psta
* the guest, false when we should restore the host state and return to the
* main run loop.
*/
-static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+static inline bool __fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code,
+ const exit_handler_fn *handlers)
{
- /*
- * Save PSTATE early so that we can evaluate the vcpu mode
- * early on.
- */
- synchronize_vcpu_pstate(vcpu, exit_code);
-
- /*
- * Check whether we want to repaint the state one way or
- * another.
- */
- early_exit_filter(vcpu, exit_code);
-
if (ARM_EXCEPTION_CODE(*exit_code) != ARM_EXCEPTION_IRQ)
vcpu->arch.fault.esr_el2 = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ESR);
@@ -755,7 +737,7 @@ static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(stru
goto exit;
/* Check if there's an exit handler and allow it to handle the exit. */
- if (kvm_hyp_handle_exit(vcpu, exit_code))
+ if (kvm_hyp_handle_exit(vcpu, exit_code, handlers))
goto guest;
exit:
/* Return to the host kernel and handle the exit */
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
@@ -224,19 +224,21 @@ static const exit_handler_fn *kvm_get_ex
return hyp_exit_handlers;
}
-/*
- * Some guests (e.g., protected VMs) are not be allowed to run in AArch32.
- * The ARMv8 architecture does not give the hypervisor a mechanism to prevent a
- * guest from dropping to AArch32 EL0 if implemented by the CPU. If the
- * hypervisor spots a guest in such a state ensure it is handled, and don't
- * trust the host to spot or fix it. The check below is based on the one in
- * kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run().
- *
- * Returns false if the guest ran in AArch32 when it shouldn't have, and
- * thus should exit to the host, or true if a the guest run loop can continue.
- */
-static void early_exit_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
+static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
{
+ const exit_handler_fn *handlers = kvm_get_exit_handler_array(vcpu);
+
+ synchronize_vcpu_pstate(vcpu, exit_code);
+
+ /*
+ * Some guests (e.g., protected VMs) are not be allowed to run in
+ * AArch32. The ARMv8 architecture does not give the hypervisor a
+ * mechanism to prevent a guest from dropping to AArch32 EL0 if
+ * implemented by the CPU. If the hypervisor spots a guest in such a
+ * state ensure it is handled, and don't trust the host to spot or fix
+ * it. The check below is based on the one in
+ * kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run().
+ */
if (unlikely(vcpu_is_protected(vcpu) && vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))) {
/*
* As we have caught the guest red-handed, decide that it isn't
@@ -249,6 +251,8 @@ static void early_exit_filter(struct kvm
*exit_code &= BIT(ARM_EXIT_WITH_SERROR_BIT);
*exit_code |= ARM_EXCEPTION_IL;
}
+
+ return __fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, exit_code, handlers);
}
/* Switch to the guest for legacy non-VHE systems */
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c
@@ -423,13 +423,10 @@ static const exit_handler_fn hyp_exit_ha
[ESR_ELx_EC_MOPS] = kvm_hyp_handle_mops,
};
-static const exit_handler_fn *kvm_get_exit_handler_array(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static inline bool fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
{
- return hyp_exit_handlers;
-}
+ synchronize_vcpu_pstate(vcpu, exit_code);
-static void early_exit_filter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
-{
/*
* If we were in HYP context on entry, adjust the PSTATE view
* so that the usual helpers work correctly.
@@ -449,6 +446,8 @@ static void early_exit_filter(struct kvm
*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~(PSR_MODE_MASK | PSR_MODE32_BIT);
*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= mode;
}
+
+ return __fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, exit_code, hyp_exit_handlers);
}
/* Switch to the guest for VHE systems running in EL2 */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from broonie@kernel.org are
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch
queue-6.13/regulator-check-that-dummy-regulator-has-been-probed-before-using-it.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-eagerly-switch-zcr_el-1-2.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-mark-some-header-functions-as-inline.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-remove-host-fpsimd-saving-for-non-protected-kvm.patch
queue-6.13/regulator-dummy-force-synchronous-probing.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-refactor-exit-handlers.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-unconditionally-save-flush-host-fpsimd-sve-sme-state.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.smen.patch
queue-6.13/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.zen.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-24 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 0:10 [PATCH 6.13 v2 0/8] KVM: arm64: Backport of SVE fixes to v6.13 Mark Brown
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 1/8] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:28 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 2/8] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:30 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 3/8] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:30 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 4/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:27 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 5/8] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:25 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 6/8] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:28 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` gregkh [this message]
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 7/8] KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:29 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
2025-03-21 0:10 ` [PATCH 6.13 v2 8/8] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Brown
2025-03-21 17:26 ` Sasha Levin
2025-03-24 18:56 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2}" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-12 23:49 [PATCH 6.13 6/8] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-03-13 16:09 ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers" has been added to the 6.13-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025032428-uncivil-amplify-e3cb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.