From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+1c486d0b62032c82a968@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jack@suse.cz, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: fix the racy usage of fs_struct->in_exec
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:09:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325100936.GC29185@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGudoHE8AKKxvtw+e4KpOV5DuVcVdtTwO0XjaYSaFir+09gWhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/24, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 7:28 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > So to me it would be better to have the trivial fix for stable,
> > exactly because it is trivially backportable. Then cleanup/simplify
> > this logic on top of it.
>
> So I got myself a crap testcase with a CLONE_FS'ed task which can
> execve and sanity-checked that suid is indeed not honored as expected.
So you mean my patch can't fix the problem?
> Anyhow, the plan would be to serialize on the bit, synchronized with
> the current spin lock. copy_fs would call a helper to wait for it to
> clear, would still bump ->users under the spin lock.
>
> This would decouple the handling from cred_mutex and avoid weirdness
> like clearing the ->in_exec flag when we never set it.
I don't really understand the idea, but as I said I won't argue with
another solution.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 19:09 [syzbot] [fs?] [mm?] KCSAN: data-race in bprm_execve / copy_fs (4) syzbot
2025-03-20 20:09 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-21 1:44 ` Al Viro
2025-03-21 8:10 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-21 8:49 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-21 8:45 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-22 1:00 ` Al Viro
2025-03-22 6:26 ` Kees Cook
2025-03-22 10:15 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-22 10:28 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-22 10:23 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-22 15:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-22 18:50 ` Al Viro
2025-03-23 18:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-23 20:57 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-24 16:00 ` [PATCH] exec: fix the racy usage of fs_struct->in_exec Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 17:01 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-24 18:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-24 22:24 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-25 10:09 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-03-25 11:01 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-25 13:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-25 13:30 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-25 14:15 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-25 14:46 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-25 18:40 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-29 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-04-29 16:57 ` Kees Cook
2025-04-29 17:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250325100936.GC29185@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=syzbot+1c486d0b62032c82a968@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.