From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Vernon Lovejoy <vlovejoy@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/dumpstack: Fix broken unwinding from exception stacks
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 14:27:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325132735.GC7904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250325-2025-03-unwind-fixes-v1-2-acd774364768@google.com>
On 03/25, Jann Horn wrote:
>
> Commit 2e4be0d011f2 ("x86/show_trace_log_lvl: Ensure stack pointer is
> aligned, again") was intended to ensure alignment of the stack pointer; but
> it also moved the initialization of the "stack" variable down into the loop
> header. This was likely intended as a no-op cleanup, since the commit
> message does not mention it;
Yes... initial version didn't do this, this was requested during review
and I didn't realize this adds another problem.
Thanks Jann!
Oleg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 2:01 [PATCH 0/2] x86 unwind fixes (1 unwinder fix, 1 missing entry ORC annotation) Jann Horn
2025-03-25 2:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/entry: Fix ORC for PUSH_REGS with save_ret=1 Jann Horn
2025-03-25 7:46 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/entry: Fix ORC unwinder " tip-bot2 for Jann Horn
2025-03-25 2:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/dumpstack: Fix broken unwinding from exception stacks Jann Horn
2025-03-25 2:24 ` Jann Horn
2025-03-25 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 7:46 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/dumpstack: Fix inaccurate unwinding from exception stacks due to misplaced assignment tip-bot2 for Jann Horn
2025-03-25 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250325132735.GC7904@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vlovejoy@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.