From: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-team@cloudflare.com,
Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ima: process_measurement() needlessly takes inode_lock() on MAY_READ
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:58:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250325155934.4120184-1-fred@cloudflare.com> (raw)
On IMA policy update, if a measure rule exists in the policy,
IMA_MEASURE is set for ima_policy_flags which makes the violation_check
variable always true. Coupled with a no-action on MAY_READ for a
FILE_CHECK call, we're always taking the inode_lock().
This becomes a performance problem for extremely heavy read-only workloads.
Therefore, prevent this only in the case there's no action to be taken.
Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 2aebb7984437..78921e69ee14 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, char *buf, loff_t size,
action = ima_get_action(inode, mask, func, &pcr);
violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) &&
(ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
- if (!action && !violation_check)
+ if (!action && (mask == MAY_READ || !violation_check))
return 0;
must_appraise = action & IMA_APPRAISE;
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-25 15:58 Frederick Lawler [this message]
2025-03-25 16:30 ` [PATCH] ima: process_measurement() needlessly takes inode_lock() on MAY_READ Roberto Sassu
2025-03-25 16:42 ` Frederick Lawler
2025-03-25 17:01 ` Roberto Sassu
2025-03-25 17:21 ` Frederick Lawler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-25 18:15 Frederick Lawler
2025-03-25 18:18 ` Frederick Lawler
2025-03-26 9:56 ` Roberto Sassu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250325155934.4120184-1-fred@cloudflare.com \
--to=fred@cloudflare.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.