All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudfalre.com,
	Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] ima: process_measurement() needlessly takes inode_lock() on MAY_READ
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:09:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250327160916.279090-1-fred@cloudflare.com> (raw)

On IMA policy update, if a measure rule exists in the policy,
IMA_MEASURE is set for ima_policy_flags which makes the violation_check
variable always true. Coupled with a no-action on MAY_READ for a
FILE_CHECK call, we're always taking the inode_lock().

This becomes a performance problem for extremely heavy read-only workloads.
Therefore, prevent this only in the case there's no action to be taken.

Signed-off-by: Frederick Lawler <fred@cloudflare.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- s/mask & MAY_WRITE/file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE/

Changes since v1:
- Add MAY_WRITE && action check to violation_check to avoid MAY_READ
  only situations
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 9b87556b03a7..bc453f5a7531 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -237,7 +237,9 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred,
 				&allowed_algos);
 	violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK ||
 			    func == MMAP_CHECK_REQPROT) &&
-			   (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE));
+			   (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE) &&
+			   ((action & IMA_MEASURE) ||
+			    (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)));
 	if (!action && !violation_check)
 		return 0;
 
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-03-27 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-27 16:09 Frederick Lawler [this message]
2025-03-27 16:29 ` [PATCH v3] ima: process_measurement() needlessly takes inode_lock() on MAY_READ Roberto Sassu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250327160916.279090-1-fred@cloudflare.com \
    --to=fred@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudfalre.com \
    --cc=linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-ima-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.