From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.linux.dev
Cc: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/11] station: roam blacklist AP even mid-roam
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 07:42:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250328144253.421425-8-prestwoj@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250328144253.421425-1-prestwoj@gmail.com>
If an AP directed roam frame comes in while IWD is roaming its
still valuable to parse that frame and blacklist the BSS that
sent it.
This can happen most frequently during a roam scan while connected
to an overloaded BSS that is requesting IWD roams elsewhere.
---
src/station.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/station.c b/src/station.c
index 623cfdca..c5529842 100644
--- a/src/station.c
+++ b/src/station.c
@@ -3225,12 +3225,10 @@ static void station_ap_directed_roam(struct station *station,
uint8_t req_mode;
uint16_t dtimer;
uint8_t valid_interval;
+ bool can_roam = !station_cannot_roam(station);
l_debug("ifindex: %u", netdev_get_ifindex(station->netdev));
- if (station_cannot_roam(station))
- return;
-
if (station->state != STATION_STATE_CONNECTED) {
l_debug("roam: unexpected AP directed roam -- ignore");
return;
@@ -3294,8 +3292,13 @@ static void station_ap_directed_roam(struct station *station,
* disassociating us. If either of these bits are set, set the
* ap_directed_roaming flag. Otherwise still try roaming but don't
* treat it any different than a normal roam.
+ *
+ * The only exception here is if we are in the middle of roaming
+ * (can_roam == false) since we cannot reliably know if the roam scan
+ * included frequencies from potential candidates in this request,
+ * forcing a roam in this case might result in unintended behavior.
*/
- if (req_mode & (WNM_REQUEST_MODE_DISASSOCIATION_IMMINENT |
+ if (can_roam && req_mode & (WNM_REQUEST_MODE_DISASSOCIATION_IMMINENT |
WNM_REQUEST_MODE_TERMINATION_IMMINENT |
WNM_REQUEST_MODE_ESS_DISASSOCIATION_IMMINENT))
station->ap_directed_roaming = true;
@@ -3322,15 +3325,24 @@ static void station_ap_directed_roam(struct station *station,
pos += url_len;
}
+ blacklist_add_bss(station->connected_bss->addr,
+ BLACKLIST_REASON_ROAM_REQUESTED);
+ station_debug_event(station, "ap-roam-blacklist-added");
+
+ /*
+ * Validating the frame and blacklisting should still be done even if
+ * we are mid-roam. Its important to track the BSS requesting the
+ * transition so when the current roam completes IWD will be less likely
+ * to roam back to the current BSS.
+ */
+ if (!can_roam)
+ return;
+
station->preparing_roam = true;
l_timeout_remove(station->roam_trigger_timeout);
station->roam_trigger_timeout = NULL;
- blacklist_add_bss(station->connected_bss->addr,
- BLACKLIST_REASON_ROAM_REQUESTED);
- station_debug_event(station, "ap-roam-blacklist-added");
-
if (req_mode & WNM_REQUEST_MODE_PREFERRED_CANDIDATE_LIST) {
l_debug("roam: AP sent a preferred candidate list");
station_neighbor_report_cb(station->netdev, 0, body + pos,
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-28 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-28 14:42 [PATCH v4 01/11] station: always add BSS to network blacklist on failure James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] auto-t: add test for disabling the timeout blacklist James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] blacklist: include a blacklist reason when adding/finding James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] blacklist: fix pruning to remove the entry if its expired James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] blacklist: add new blacklist reason, ROAM_REQUESTED James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] netdev: add netdev_get_low_signal_threshold James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] station: roam blacklist BSS's, and consider when roaming James Prestwood
2025-04-01 16:08 ` Denis Kenzior
2025-03-28 14:42 ` James Prestwood [this message]
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] auto-t: add tests for AP roam blacklisting James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] doc: document InitialRoamRequestedTimeout James Prestwood
2025-03-28 14:42 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] netdev: fix invalid read after netdev_free James Prestwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250328144253.421425-8-prestwoj@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.