From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BC473232 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 23:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743463783; cv=none; b=BM2EnASLPaI5KWMegplOZ8dW0Qbe533uKVPKJ26YtdflmVcpNQttLZ1JY9CQBuRDS/SL17GFma24Z07tR9ER5XBFJCZJ4DfEeyy4c8PpsIEBxEJn3jamOaqdOMHWb3w02lbjct4Rt5S0R2SjG6099tmJKeUiyCmHVrc3lUzBN00= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743463783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3DfGrlKa2RNnQ1Og6pWmroaPxsI987MWRo/n+AUirew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nxqgACOcN0TQQ6+WybsoErXded1KeQ1g8b4gIbdFBrzda28a12Uuw/IcwVt/wkNonmnIzF+n8QjfXM4ugrnwY/gjxWDKC+lkXhcbb9/2/wxjAYgRC4OFT9DnX9MJXLhIbzVXBWB9RHl/BncjkE+AHF6JVZFYgqmcGEqereKrXJ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ueSYxfwb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ueSYxfwb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EE5AC4CEE3; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 23:29:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1743463782; bh=3DfGrlKa2RNnQ1Og6pWmroaPxsI987MWRo/n+AUirew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ueSYxfwb9+nbHK2MSRrzTBLVxENKfkpEUsc99IEU2q/Zblx2bEEdzX0yny7mBPr8K feBk7024dZqip5E5/LB8JTauDUA/LHAcczxDJS5APuBTCEv0XVy6AOCOfbzC4c7TsR nO8pEzz/lU+X+LgQRw3BYSDTNPlSGdqR0MB9m3dhyu1QoDcU9cHY7VHkrbS0N7u5u+ f6JH2G1++YJW2ogmMdbdO9yFplqXwUZXpcYR4uw9FKQ7x4TiZyIsulBwNEjviuf/fo K0jUU/DqIEe8VVfWsXxmWmavUp4dr1wY7VrjHiDpOjHMcpazXCj64hKDUWqqGgmtwn qpxZbQSa3Tg/A== Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:29:41 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Kuniyuki Iwashima , Cc: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net 0/3] udp: Fix two integer overflows when sk->sk_rcvbuf is close to INT_MAX. Message-ID: <20250331162941.01e14713@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20250331203303.17835-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> References: <20250331185515.5053-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> <20250331203303.17835-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:31:47 -0700 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > > Please do test locally if you can. > > > > Sure, will try the same tests with CI. > > Is there a way to tell NIPA to run a test in a dedicated VM ? > > I see some tests succeed when executed solely but fail when > executed with > > make -C tools/testing/selftests/ TARGETS=net run_tests > > When combined with other tests, assuming that the global UDP usage > will soon drop to 0 is not always easy... so it's defeating the > purpose but I'd drop the test in v5 not to make CI unhappy. Can we account for some level of system noise? Or try to dump all the sockets and count the "accounted for" in-use memory? We can do various things in NIPA, but I'm not sure if it's okay for tests inside net/ should require a completely idle system. If we want a completely idle system maybe user-mode Linux + kunit is a better direction? Willem, WDYT?