All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"Mateusz Jończyk" <mat.jonczyk@o2.pl>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Anna-Maria Behnsen" <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	"Frederic Weisbecker" <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:50:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250403135031.giGKVTEO@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sempv17b.ffs@tglx>

On 2025-04-03 15:12:08 [+0200], Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Converting it to a raw lock "fixes" the problem, but RT people will hunt
> you down with a big latency bat.
> 
> But this is not related to the commit above and not new.
> 
> timekeeping_suspend() has always invoked mach_get_cmos_time() with the
> freeze lock held and mc146818_get_time() has always locked rtc_lock.
> 
> I wonder, why this splat hasn't popped before. On RT lockdep should have
> complained forever. Sebastian???

I sure haven't seen it. But it has to.

> Suspend, whether it's suspend to idle or regular suspend, are weird
> contexts as there is no concurrency possible because interrupts are
> disabled and it is guaranteed that there is only a single CPU which is
> operational. The other CPUs are either in a deep idle state or when they
> are on the way back, they serialize on tick_freeze_lock.
> 
> So taking the non-raw spinlock in that context is safe, but obviously
> lockdep does not know about that.
> 
> Peter, any ideas?

We can tell lockdep that. I will look into this.

> Thanks,
> 
>         tglx

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-03 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-30 11:32 [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Borislav Petkov
2025-03-30 12:23 ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-03-30 12:32   ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-03 13:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-03 13:50   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-04-03 19:36     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 20:26       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-04  6:16         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 13:34         ` [PATCH] timekeeping: Add a lockdep override in tick_freeze() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-04 18:47           ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-09 19:13           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-09 21:12           ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-31 18:27           ` [PATCH] " Chris Bainbridge
2025-05-31 19:16             ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-02 19:52               ` Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 20:20                 ` [DRAFT PATCH] rtc-cmos: use spin_lock_irqsave in cmos_interrupt Mateusz Jończyk
2025-06-02 21:19                   ` Chris Bainbridge
2025-06-03  6:47                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-04-03 23:46   ` [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] rtc_lock at: mc146818_avoid_UIP Mateusz Jończyk
2025-04-04  7:39     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250403135031.giGKVTEO@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mat.jonczyk@o2.pl \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.