From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5ED423C9 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2025 03:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743995113; cv=none; b=ZrCk6gkXSz+OtvQisBzIDy5zQA+0HeO5BU3SwMD4QsCpuJ6pvsfqetm8st6ZE2VNogWuIzTADo6IjXc9NIwrLDvKZE41+7NubjJ1IPomNMxM+nvFbPQQ7JMHWd5VGc0aFQ1mBlB4kU3khRL2QG6/8tmxl2/z99b9oMgeu9wuNtM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743995113; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KbXqFZzfTcX4nu5RN0pAfUzk5BAJnbxEYQ3gbYvVrgk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MqIZZKKElwOVlyM7JfGcAKxDHuPiXMPu7S8JHOEGawUlfOpoi5uC+9dqRVfdDQ3AYUdYFLhA7B1YLW09SYNWMH4vU29+xP9bFaunxKictdkAXhN+kFafHj2KjK1LWeeELa9Rfz4y6JFcXZiKEE3SrnwgiCgto9G7rxk7Mf5i/W8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NnG4Ixb3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NnG4Ixb3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1743995112; x=1775531112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KbXqFZzfTcX4nu5RN0pAfUzk5BAJnbxEYQ3gbYvVrgk=; b=NnG4Ixb3UOAz0QGuWXPLukfkZmwqi/GOBaj0xdchb3qwnq8Gos8gqF0z jhml/QFDtSkQg2HN4Vij+xQ4EmJ1aDz3Ze0/0F5cz5FElKkrvwd0qgUV7 5WV3vRphEAsm/Ukw0KkTS5fVFvf7BtO9+Y1uwkpV8KFaWHNubs6hC5wpa xUbVzo3HX6N7+4mRrMQ9en8/NpVt/FVbmjClWtW9PIjZM/ucPL2zpZRi8 KPz8EemJKEVApbZqmfMIB9EH49PMihrCdFvXNzQFLZUfsFfxheRJqSFM0 4tYQcWJMh2+PjsTEaJT1//visssPae2F8oydv7IQ2djoqGl76p+zvQe1e g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RS17jU1BTNG+aFZt4j3ujA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DsPdS9CMSGGYaDViGlY3oA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11396"; a="45248265" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,193,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="45248265" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2025 20:03:24 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9+iOHGPFQHecgh55BSQQ2Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: QZWEidnlRGiFgl5hgD10+w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,193,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="127656890" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b207828170a5) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2025 20:03:22 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b207828170a5 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1u1clc-0002wF-26; Mon, 07 Apr 2025 03:03:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:02:33 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] KEYS: Add a list for unreferenced keys Message-ID: <202504071059.ondXrCEF-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250407003622.22139-1-jarkko@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250407003622.22139-1-jarkko@kernel.org> Hi Jarkko, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.15-rc1] [cannot apply to dhowells-fs/fscache-next dhowells-fs/keys-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jarkko-Sakkinen/KEYS-Add-a-list-for-unreferenced-keys/20250407-083754 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250407003622.22139-1-jarkko%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH v6] KEYS: Add a list for unreferenced keys config: riscv-randconfig-001-20250407 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250407/202504071059.ondXrCEF-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250407/202504071059.ondXrCEF-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504071059.ondXrCEF-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): riscv64-linux-ld: security/keys/key.o: in function `.LANCHOR0': >> security/keys/key.c:26: multiple definition of `key_graveyard_lock'; security/keys/gc.o:security/keys/gc.c:14: first defined here riscv64-linux-ld: security/keys/key.o: in function `.LANCHOR0': >> security/keys/key.c:25: multiple definition of `key_graveyard'; security/keys/gc.o:security/keys/gc.c:13: first defined here vim +26 security/keys/key.c 22 23 struct rb_root key_user_tree; /* tree of quota records indexed by UID */ 24 DEFINE_SPINLOCK(key_user_lock); > 25 LIST_HEAD(key_graveyard); > 26 DEFINE_SPINLOCK(key_graveyard_lock); 27 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki