All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
	hramamurthy@google.com, kuniyu@amazon.com, jdamato@fastly.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible
Date: Mon,  7 Apr 2025 12:01:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407190117.16528-5-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250407190117.16528-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Netdev queue dump accesses: NAPI, memory providers, XSk pointers.
All three are "ops protected" now, switch to the op compat locking.
rtnl lock does not have to be taken for "ops locked" devices.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/netdev-genl.c | 18 +++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index 5d7af50fe702..7ef9b0191936 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -481,18 +481,15 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	if (!rsp)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	rtnl_lock();
-
-	netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(genl_info_net(info), ifindex);
+	netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(genl_info_net(info),
+						     ifindex);
 	if (netdev) {
 		err = netdev_nl_queue_fill(rsp, netdev, q_id, q_type, info);
-		netdev_unlock(netdev);
+		netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
 	} else {
 		err = -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	rtnl_unlock();
-
 	if (err)
 		goto err_free_msg;
 
@@ -541,17 +538,17 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 	if (info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX])
 		ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QUEUE_IFINDEX]);
 
-	rtnl_lock();
 	if (ifindex) {
-		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock(net, ifindex);
+		netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(net, ifindex);
 		if (netdev) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
-			netdev_unlock(netdev);
+			netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
 		} else {
 			err = -ENODEV;
 		}
 	} else {
-		for_each_netdev_lock_scoped(net, netdev, ctx->ifindex) {
+		for_each_netdev_lock_ops_compat_scoped(net, netdev,
+						       ctx->ifindex) {
 			err = netdev_nl_queue_dump_one(netdev, skb, info, ctx);
 			if (err < 0)
 				break;
@@ -559,7 +556,6 @@ int netdev_nl_queue_get_dumpit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 			ctx->txq_idx = 0;
 		}
 	}
-	rtnl_unlock();
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.49.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-07 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 19:01 [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: avoid potential race between netdev_get_by_index_lock() and netns switch Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:40   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:17   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08 14:59     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:41   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-08  2:28   ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with netdev->lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:30   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:31   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] docs: netdev: break down the instance locking info per ops struct Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:34   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08 15:08     ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-07 19:01 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for qstats in ops locked drivers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08  2:37   ` Joe Damato
2025-04-08  0:28 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250407190117.16528-5-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.