From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,mgorman@techsingularity.net,huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com,bharata@amd.com,nikhil.dhama@amd.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + mm-pcp-increase-pcp-free_count-threshold-to-trigger-free_high.patch added to mm-new branch
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 12:04:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250407190447.D322DC4CEDD@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Subject: mm: pcp: increase pcp->free_count threshold to trigger free_high
has been added to the -mm mm-new branch. Its filename is
mm-pcp-increase-pcp-free_count-threshold-to-trigger-free_high.patch
This patch will shortly appear at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-pcp-increase-pcp-free_count-threshold-to-trigger-free_high.patch
This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Nikhil Dhama <nikhil.dhama@amd.com>
Subject: mm: pcp: increase pcp->free_count threshold to trigger free_high
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 16:22:19 +0530
In old pcp design, pcp->free_factor gets incremented in nr_pcp_free()
which is invoked by free_pcppages_bulk(). So, it used to increase
free_factor by 1 only when we try to reduce the size of pcp list or flush
for high order, and free_high used to trigger only for order > 0 and order
< costly_order and pcp->free_factor > 0.
For iperf3 I noticed that with older design in kernel v6.6, pcp list was
drained mostly when pcp->count > high (more often when count goes above
530). and most of the time pcp->free_factor was 0, triggering very few
high order flushes.
But this is changed in the current design, introduced in commit
6ccdcb6d3a74 ("mm, pcp: reduce detecting time of consecutive high order
page freeing"), where pcp->free_factor is changed to pcp->free_count to
keep track of the number of pages freed contiguously. In this design,
pcp->free_count is incremented on every deallocation, irrespective of
whether pcp list was reduced or not. And logic to trigger free_high is if
pcp->free_count goes above batch (which is 63) and there are two
contiguous page free without any allocation.
With this design, for iperf3, pcp list is getting flushed more frequently
because free_high heuristics is triggered more often now. I observed that
high order pcp list is drained as soon as both count and free_count goes
above 63.
Due to this more aggressive high order flushing, applications doing
contiguous high order allocation will require to go to global list more
frequently.
On a 2-node AMD machine with 384 vCPUs on each node, connected via
Mellonox connectX-7, I am seeing a ~30% performance reduction if we scale
number of iperf3 client/server pairs from 32 to 64.
Though this new design reduced the time to detect high order flushes, but
for application which are allocating high order pages more frequently it
may be flushing the high order list pre-maturely. This motivates towards
tuning on how late or early we should flush high order lists.
So, in this patch, we increased the pcp->free_count threshold to trigger
free_high from "batch" to "batch + pcp->high_min / 2". This new threshold
keeps high order pages in pcp list for a longer duration which can help
the application doing high order allocations frequently.
With this patch performace to Iperf3 is restored and score for other
benchmarks on the same machine are as follows:
iperf3 lmbench3 netperf kbuild
(AF_UNIX) (SCTP_STREAM_MANY)
------- --------- ----------------- ------
v6.6 vanilla (base) 100 100 100 100
v6.12 vanilla 69 113 98.5 98.8
v6.12 + this patch 100 110.3 100.2 99.3
netperf-tcp:
6.12 6.12
vanilla this_patch
Hmean 64 732.14 ( 0.00%) 730.45 ( -0.23%)
Hmean 128 1417.46 ( 0.00%) 1419.44 ( 0.14%)
Hmean 256 2679.67 ( 0.00%) 2676.45 ( -0.12%)
Hmean 1024 8328.52 ( 0.00%) 8339.34 ( 0.13%)
Hmean 2048 12716.98 ( 0.00%) 12743.68 ( 0.21%)
Hmean 3312 15787.79 ( 0.00%) 15887.25 ( 0.63%)
Hmean 4096 17311.91 ( 0.00%) 17332.68 ( 0.12%)
Hmean 8192 20310.73 ( 0.00%) 20465.09 ( 0.76%)
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250407105219.55351-1-nikhil.dhama@amd.com
Fixes: 6ccdcb6d3a74 ("mm, pcp: reduce detecting time of consecutive high order page freeing")
Signed-off-by: Nikhil Dhama <nikhil.dhama@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-pcp-increase-pcp-free_count-threshold-to-trigger-free_high
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2669,7 +2669,7 @@ static void free_frozen_page_commit(stru
* stops will be drained from vmstat refresh context.
*/
if (order && order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) {
- free_high = (pcp->free_count >= batch &&
+ free_high = (pcp->free_count >= (batch + pcp->high_min / 2) &&
(pcp->flags & PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER) &&
(!(pcp->flags & PCPF_FREE_HIGH_BATCH) ||
pcp->count >= batch));
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from nikhil.dhama@amd.com are
mm-pcp-increase-pcp-free_count-threshold-to-trigger-free_high.patch
reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250407190447.D322DC4CEDD@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.dhama@amd.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.