From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-184.mta0.migadu.com (out-184.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7468225764 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 15:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744125420; cv=none; b=oLEDTmqROJJehj8wA2T+Dlqg7qyEG/LlHMGDOwQlCazTKjaQn+4v7OWShQ9o48Vc0y5LsQLNS73JbGh93B4R+qY9leB2I4UQgLWqebOjBSXGiESKfIllS/8VM99sxQW0d09x5lkY5K21l82nWSJ/p2aGLX7j3ihk+iVnzn/HFPE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744125420; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eljeVUsj4Y3afj7HjvRD6nP+JhnnN+HA3/2dP1hlEgY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YfY37vblFGby6TqvD0M7ba3jguU1rGaiCDFSvnOQbUpT92fRUIgLkU3F7UeK99IK99cZsO6D2wGJPeuVUocV7Ux45W0KGhTwUewoSCfgG5dca4STIlz+9outVZFOmbdMoFjhhkeRjE/v8KJjUX6x62DGvrrLU2T7dv7kjPWU+2I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=vxXUXp/T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.184 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="vxXUXp/T" Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 17:16:54 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1744125416; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=howVdPIkMfOUgO+Gwm1Gb4UXrK3hJ8RVN2V9iJFtutg=; b=vxXUXp/TemNNzwVVqKvbX0gR0WSzQIT1ipFzYkoMxOqjDgqnnW9DNK5Bz95vG7sg0apf7G RHmrZVP8WMAe4VEtDsmsAxddWvumwcyeCwqC+pdbU64DnYJj0/tvVvDh4OxqdI+fJGmM1j WPrL/+5SoDDNm42oHoXgDx/aoKBqVvI= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Andrew Jones To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: alexandru.elisei@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, jean-philippe@linaro.org Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] arm/arm64: efi: Bump number of memregions Message-ID: <20250408-bd9dcf82f26d72cee5d8013c@orel> References: <20250408150413.97104-2-andrew.jones@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250408150413.97104-2-andrew.jones@linux.dev> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 05:04:14PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > When using QEMU's 'max' cpu type additional EFI memory regions are > present. Just like riscv's commit f35fe0ee486a ("riscv: efi: Bump > number of memregions"), bump the number we allow to ensure we don't > hit the assert in memregions_add(). > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones > --- > lib/arm/setup.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/lib/arm/setup.c b/lib/arm/setup.c > index aaa0da9804a2..67b5db07ba8f 100644 > --- a/lib/arm/setup.c > +++ b/lib/arm/setup.c > @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ > #include "io.h" > > #define MAX_DT_MEM_REGIONS 16 > -#define NR_EXTRA_MEM_REGIONS 64 > +#define NR_EXTRA_MEM_REGIONS 128 > #define NR_MEM_REGIONS (MAX_DT_MEM_REGIONS + NR_EXTRA_MEM_REGIONS) > > extern unsigned long _text, _etext, _data, _edata; > -- > 2.49.0 > Merged through arm/queue. Thanks, drew