From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B67FC369A4 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 05:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=W94j31G+r8Y0Cd8KcgC93GsP943xgufSZZHy829yDhA=; b=fAVzVNwKwlU6/HHkCCuY+KVXog dFF0Q/EfjEJyO4yTLIrWzDCEYKQZdTL78cIVpF73m758X5KY1YEx25PxkUDdr/L9TviJQexYhFBFs xHoMRxe5Rci9Tin/SMuFhpSwOa2q2+eNIRdBn5sy+CowGpyWvnTOzamTExj+8dLbKLfqrsj+cCkvC cKeG+NaYDdxGr8X93PsFvurpZqzijL6QWl9NruvS1d2Dr2TUgLA8w/ebpBI64XwCBLTN1TPiow7Dd ad49Le9gMCAhjtgHanrv+xm5P06UrtGfcil28Hkul76qhJuptatshdrcHK0fuYIGxPt8Me8Pv2IT0 b/ilILEQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u21zN-00000002pTG-0JO7; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 05:59:13 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u21yn-00000002pO7-2Kcu for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2025 05:58:39 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 96D1F67373; Tue, 8 Apr 2025 07:58:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 07:58:30 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kuniyuki Iwashima Cc: hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk, gechangzhong@cestc.cn, kbusch@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, shaopeijie@cestc.cn, zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-tcp: Fix netns UAF introduced by commit 1be52169c348 Message-ID: <20250408055830.GA708@lst.de> References: <20250408050408.GA32223@lst.de> <20250408055549.16568-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250408055549.16568-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250407_225837_732876_D010F99D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.11 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:55:27PM -0700, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > Which branch/tag should be based on, for-next or nvme-6.15 ? > http://git.infradead.org/nvme.git nvme-6.15 is the canonical tree, but for bug fixes I'm fine with almost anything :)