From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 nf-next 1/2] netfilter: bridge: Add conntrack double vlan and pppoe
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 18:39:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408163931.GA11581@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408142619.95619-2-ericwouds@gmail.com>
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> This adds the capability to conntrack 802.1ad, QinQ, PPPoE and PPPoE-in-Q
> packets that are passing a bridge.
Conntrack is l2 agnostic, so this either requires distinct
ip addresses in the vlans/pppoe tunneled traffic or users
need to configure connection tracking zones manually to
ensure there are no collisions or traffic merges (i.e.,
packet x from PPPoE won't be merged with frag from a vlan).
Actually reading nf_ct_br_defrag4/6 it seems existing
code already has this bug :/
I currently don't see a fix for this problem.
Can't add L2 addresses to conntrack since those aren't
unique accross vlans/tunnels and they can change anyway
even mid-stream, we can't add ifindexes into the mix
as we'd miss all reply traffic, can't use the vlan tag
since it can be vlan-in-vlan etc.
So likely, we have to live with this.
Maybe refuse to track (i.e. ACCEPT) vlan/8021ad qinq, etc.
traffic if the skb has no template with a zone attached to it?
This would at least push 'address collisions' into the
'incorrect ruleset configuration' domain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 14:26 [PATCH v11 nf-next 0/2] conntrack: bridge: add double vlan, pppoe and pppoe-in-q Eric Woudstra
2025-04-08 14:26 ` [PATCH v11 nf-next 1/2] netfilter: bridge: Add conntrack double vlan and pppoe Eric Woudstra
2025-04-08 16:39 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-04-08 16:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-08 18:33 ` Eric Woudstra
2025-04-08 18:48 ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-08 18:56 ` Eric Woudstra
2025-04-08 14:26 ` [PATCH v11 nf-next 2/2] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge " Eric Woudstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250408163931.GA11581@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.