All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	"John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 16:13:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504091607.0A394D5EF@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409185019.238841-39-paul@paul-moore.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 02:49:53PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> The LSM currently has a lot of code to maintain a list of the
> currently active LSMs in a human readable string, with the only
> user being the "/sys/kernel/security/lsm" code.  Let's drop all
> of that code and generate the string on an as-needed basis when
> userspace reads "/sys/kernel/security/lsm".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h |  1 -
>  security/inode.c          | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  security/lsm_init.c       | 49 ---------------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index 4cd17c9a229f..bc477fb20d02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -169,7 +169,6 @@ struct lsm_info {
>  
>  
>  /* DO NOT tamper with these variables outside of the LSM framework */
> -extern char *lsm_names;
>  extern struct lsm_static_calls_table static_calls_table __ro_after_init;
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/security/inode.c b/security/inode.c
> index da3ab44c8e57..49bc3578bd23 100644
> --- a/security/inode.c
> +++ b/security/inode.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>  #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
>  
> +#include "lsm.h"
> +
>  static struct vfsmount *mount;
>  static int mount_count;
>  
> @@ -343,8 +345,29 @@ static struct dentry *lsm_dentry;
>  static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
>  			loff_t *ppos)
>  {
> -	return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names,
> -		strlen(lsm_names));
> +	int i;
> +	char *str;
> +	ssize_t rc, len = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < lsm_count; i++)
> +		/* the '+ 1' accounts for either a comma or a NUL terminator */
> +		len += strlen(lsm_order[i]->id->name) + 1;
> +
> +	str = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!str)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	str[0] = '\0';
> +
> +	i = 0;
> +	while (i < lsm_count) {
> +		strcat(str, lsm_order[i]->id->name);
> +		if (++i < lsm_count)
> +			strcat(str, ",");
> +	}
> +
> +	rc = simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, str, len);
> +	kfree(str);
> +	return rc;

Hrm, at least cache it?

static char *lsm_names;
static ssize_t lsm_names_len;

static ssize_t lsm_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count,
			loff_t *ppos)
{
	if (!lsm_names) {
		int i;
		char *str;
		ssize_t len = 0;
		...
		lsm_names = str;
	}

	return simple_read_from_buffer(buf, count, ppos, lsm_names, lsm_names_len);
}

Better yet, do this whole thing in a initcall after LSMs are loaded, and
both can gain __ro_after_init...

>  
>  static const struct file_operations lsm_ops = {
> diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
> index 981ddb20f48e..978bb81b58fa 100644
> --- a/security/lsm_init.c
> +++ b/security/lsm_init.c
> @@ -10,8 +10,6 @@
>  
>  #include "lsm.h"
>  
> -char *lsm_names;
> -
>  /* Pointers to LSM sections defined in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h */
>  extern struct lsm_info __start_lsm_info[], __end_lsm_info[];
>  extern struct lsm_info __start_early_lsm_info[], __end_early_lsm_info[];
> @@ -363,42 +361,6 @@ static void __init lsm_init_ordered(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool match_last_lsm(const char *list, const char *lsm)
> -{
> -	const char *last;
> -
> -	if (WARN_ON(!list || !lsm))
> -		return false;
> -	last = strrchr(list, ',');
> -	if (last)
> -		/* Pass the comma, strcmp() will check for '\0' */
> -		last++;
> -	else
> -		last = list;
> -	return !strcmp(last, lsm);
> -}
> -
> -static int lsm_append(const char *new, char **result)
> -{
> -	char *cp;
> -
> -	if (*result == NULL) {
> -		*result = kstrdup(new, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (*result == NULL)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -	} else {
> -		/* Check if it is the last registered name */
> -		if (match_last_lsm(*result, new))
> -			return 0;
> -		cp = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s,%s", *result, new);
> -		if (cp == NULL)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> -		kfree(*result);
> -		*result = cp;
> -	}
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void __init lsm_static_call_init(struct security_hook_list *hl)
>  {
>  	struct lsm_static_call *scall = hl->scalls;
> @@ -435,15 +397,6 @@ void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
>  		hooks[i].lsmid = lsmid;
>  		lsm_static_call_init(&hooks[i]);
>  	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Don't try to append during early_security_init(), we'll come back
> -	 * and fix this up afterwards.
> -	 */
> -	if (slab_is_available()) {
> -		if (lsm_append(lsmid->name, &lsm_names) < 0)
> -			panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
> -	}
>  }
>  
>  int __init early_security_init(void)
> @@ -480,8 +433,6 @@ int __init security_init(void)
>  	lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
>  		init_debug("  early started: %s (%s)\n", lsm->id->name,
>  			   is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> -		if (lsm->enabled)
> -			lsm_append(lsm->id->name, &lsm_names);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Load LSMs in specified order. */
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-09 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 126+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 18:49 [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 01/29] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:17   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 12:14   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 02/29] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:18   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:01   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 03/29] lsm: simplify prepare_lsm() and rename to lsm_prep_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:30   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 21:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:10   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 04/29] lsm: simplify ordered_lsm_init() and rename to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 22:31     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 05/29] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:40   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:20   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 06/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM order symbols naming Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:00   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 22:23   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 07/29] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:38   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 21:58     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:06   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 22:04     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 22:25       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  0:58         ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 08/29] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:13   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-04-10 22:47     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:15       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  3:14         ` Paul Moore
2025-04-15 22:30       ` John Johansen
2025-05-22 21:26   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 09/29] lsm: cleanup and normalize the LSM enabled functions Paul Moore
2025-04-10  0:11   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  1:50     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:03       ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:14       ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:17         ` Kees Cook
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 10/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:29   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:02   ` John Johansen
2025-04-19  2:42   ` Fan Wu
2025-04-19  5:53     ` Kees Cook
2025-04-19 15:58       ` Fan Wu
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 11/29] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:30   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-15 23:04   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 12/29] lsm: cleanup the LSM ordered parsing Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 13/29] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:49 ` [RFC PATCH 14/29] lsm: add missing function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-05-14 10:10   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 15/29] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 16/29] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:01   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 17/29] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-04-09 21:16   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-10 20:52     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:59   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 18/29] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:39   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  1:15     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:16       ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  2:41         ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 11:57   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 19/29] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:40   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-14 21:19   ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15  1:58     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:02   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 20/29] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:42   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  2:30     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 17:30   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 17:47     ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-11 20:09     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-14 21:04   ` Fan Wu
2025-04-15  1:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 21/29] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 12:05   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 22/29] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:43   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11 19:20     ` Micah Morton
2025-04-11 20:45       ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 12:18   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 23/29] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:33   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 24/29] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:44   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:31   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 25/29] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-05-14 13:06   ` John Johansen
2025-06-11 20:09     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-30 22:03   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-06-11 20:27     ` Paul Moore
2025-06-13 20:34       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-07-21 21:59         ` Paul Moore
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 26/29] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-04-10 16:33   ` Stephen Smalley
2025-04-11  3:24     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-23 15:12   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 27/29] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:52   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  1:21     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-11  2:16       ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:38   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 28/29] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
2025-04-09 23:53   ` Kees Cook
2025-05-14 13:34   ` John Johansen
2025-04-09 18:50 ` [RFC PATCH 29/29] lsm: add support for counting lsm_prop support among LSMs Paul Moore
2025-05-13 16:39   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-13 20:23     ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 19:30       ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 20:57         ` Paul Moore
2025-05-14 21:16           ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-14 22:11             ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 14:12               ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 18:13                 ` Paul Moore
2025-05-15 19:41                   ` Casey Schaufler
2025-05-15 21:02                     ` Paul Moore
2025-04-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/29] Rework the LSM initialization Casey Schaufler
2025-04-10 16:31   ` Kees Cook
2025-04-11  2:28   ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202504091607.0A394D5EF@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wufan@kernel.org \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.