All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:14:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410101402.GC30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409111539.23791-5-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>

On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 11:15:38AM +0000, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> +static inline int sched_newidle_pull_overloaded(struct sched_domain *sd,
> +						struct rq *this_rq,
> +						int *continue_balancing)
> +{
> +	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(load_balance_mask);
> +	int cpu, this_cpu = cpu_of(this_rq);
> +	struct sched_domain *sd_parent;
> +	struct lb_env env = {
> +		.dst_cpu	= this_cpu,
> +		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
> +		.idle		= CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
> +	};
> +
> +
> +	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_active_mask);
> +
> +next_domain:
> +	env.sd = sd;
> +	/* Allow migrating cache_hot tasks too. */
> +	sd->nr_balance_failed = sd->cache_nice_tries + 1;
> +
> +	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, this_cpu) {
> +		struct sched_domain_shared *sd_share;
> +		struct cpumask *overloaded_mask;
> +		struct sched_domain *cpu_llc;
> +		int overloaded_cpu;
> +
> +		cpu_llc = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
> +		if (!cpu_llc)
> +			break;
> +
> +		sd_share = cpu_llc->shared;
> +		if (!sd_share)
> +			break;
> +
> +		overloaded_mask = sd_share->overloaded_mask;
> +		if (!overloaded_mask)
> +			break;
> +
> +		for_each_cpu_wrap(overloaded_cpu, overloaded_mask, this_cpu + 1) {
> +			struct rq *overloaded_rq = cpu_rq(overloaded_cpu);
> +			struct task_struct *p = NULL;
> +
> +			if (sched_newidle_continue_balance(this_rq)) {
> +				*continue_balancing = 0;
> +				return 0;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* Quick peek to find if pushable tasks exist. */
> +			if (!has_pushable_tasks(overloaded_rq))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			scoped_guard (rq_lock, overloaded_rq) {
> +				update_rq_clock(overloaded_rq);
> +
> +				if (!has_pushable_tasks(overloaded_rq))
> +					break;

You can skip the clock update if there aren't any tasks to grab.

> +
> +				env.src_cpu = overloaded_cpu;
> +				env.src_rq = overloaded_rq;
> +
> +				p = detach_one_task(&env);

Yep, detach_one_task() uses can_migrate_task() which checks
task_on_cpu(), so that's all good :-)

> +			}
> +
> +			if (!p)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			attach_one_task(this_rq, p);
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, sched_domain_span(cpu_llc));
> +	}

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-09 11:15 [RFC PATCH 0/5] K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Add push task framework K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:25     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Introduce overloaded_mask in sched_domain_shared K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:26     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Update overloaded mask in presence of pushable task K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14  2:28   ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14  3:13     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21  5:20   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21  5:54     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-21  8:03       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-04-21  8:54         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Rework inter-NUMA newidle balancing K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:14   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-04-10 15:27     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Proactive idle balance using push mechanism K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-10 10:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-10 15:37     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 11:17 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: Idle and newidle balancing " K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250410101402.GC30687@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.