All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: b-padhi@ti.com
Cc: reatmon@ti.com, denys@konsulko.com, a-limaye@ti.com, afd@ti.com,
	u-kumar1@ti.com, s-anna@ti.com, meta-ti@lists.yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [meta-ti] [master/scarthgap][PATCH v2] ti-hsm-demo-fw: Add a recipe to export prebuilt HSM demo firmware
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:43:34 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410164334.GH13634@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410103102.2984208-1-b-padhi@ti.com>

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 04:01:02PM +0530, Beleswar Padhi via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> Add a recipe to deploy the HSM demo firmware to the DEPLOYDIR, to be
> picked up by the tisdk-core-bundle for the prebuilt binaries directory.
> This firmware is then further picked by U-Boot and packaged inside
> tispl.bin FIT image for loading the HSM M4 core in applicable SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
> ---
> v2: Changelog:
> 1. Added COMPATIBLE_MACHINE as j721s2|j784s4 for this recipe.
> 2. Used ti-hsm-demo-fw throughout instead of ti-hsm-fw.
> 3. Updated commit description to call out how the firmware will be used.
> 4. Removed the do_install() task from the recipe as this firmware is not used in
> the rootfs.
> 
> Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250327092323.1726839-1-b-padhi@ti.com/
> 
> Sorry for the delay, took some time to test this patch. Had issues with my
> setup.
> 
>  .../ti-hsm-fw/ti-hsm-demo-fw_git.bb           | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../recipes-bsp/ti-linux-fw/ti-linux-fw.inc   |  1 +
>  meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc  |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-hsm-fw/ti-hsm-demo-fw_git.bb
> 
> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-hsm-fw/ti-hsm-demo-fw_git.bb b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-hsm-fw/ti-hsm-demo-fw_git.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..f6a7b43f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-hsm-fw/ti-hsm-demo-fw_git.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +SUMMARY = "TI HSM demo Firmware"
> +
> +inherit deploy
> +
> +require recipes-bsp/ti-linux-fw/ti-linux-fw.inc
> +
> +PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
> +
> +PV = "${TI_HSM_DEMO_FW_VERSION}"
> +PR = "${INC_PR}.0"
> +
> +COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "j721s2|j784s4"
> +
> +HSM_FW_SOC:j721s2 = "j721s2"
> +HSM_FW_SOC:j784s4 = "j784s4"
> +
> +HSM_BINARY = "hsm-demo-firmware-${HSM_FW_SOC}*.bin"
> +
> +do_deploy() {
> +	install -d ${DEPLOYDIR}/ti-hsm
> +	install -m 644 ${S}/ti-hsm/${HSM_BINARY} ${DEPLOYDIR}/ti-hsm
> +}
> +
> +addtask deploy before do_build after do_compile
> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-linux-fw/ti-linux-fw.inc b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-linux-fw/ti-linux-fw.inc
> index d69109f4..ba58747a 100644
> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-linux-fw/ti-linux-fw.inc
> +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/ti-linux-fw/ti-linux-fw.inc
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ IMG_DEC_FW_VERSION = "1.0"
>  CNM_WAVE521_FW_VERSION = "1.0.7"
>  TI_DM_FW_VERSION = "11.00.09"
>  TI_SYSFW_VERSION = "11.00.07"
> +TI_HSM_DEMO_FW_VERSION = "11.00.09"
>  
>  TI_LINUX_FW_SRCREV ?= "27003b6bff61a55dd1fff2cc777e5e07b092b1f7"
>  SRCREV = "${TI_LINUX_FW_SRCREV}"
> diff --git a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc
> index 41d4abdd..3c56d8b2 100644
> --- a/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc
> +++ b/meta-ti-bsp/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc
> @@ -40,6 +40,10 @@ DEPENDS += "python3-pyelftools-native python3-pyyaml-native python3-jsonschema-n
>  DEPENDS:append:k3 = " ti-sci-fw"
>  DEPENDS:append:k3r5 = " ti-sci-fw"
>  
> +# HSM Demo Firmware is only applicable for J721S2 & J784S4 devices
> +DEPENDS:append:j721s2 = " ti-hsm-demo-fw"
> +DEPENDS:append:j784s4 = " ti-hsm-demo-fw"

While this is fine as it is, it kind of hardcodes HSM for these 2 platforms.

I was wondering if it would be better to make it a PACKAGECONFIG the same way 
we already do with atf, optee, dm, and such, so it can be easily toggled?


>  DM_FIRMWARE = "ipc_echo_testb_mcu1_0_release_strip.xer5f"
>  
>  PLAT_SFX = ""
> -- 
> 2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 10:31 [master/scarthgap][PATCH v2] ti-hsm-demo-fw: Add a recipe to export prebuilt HSM demo firmware Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-10 16:43 ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2025-04-11  8:44   ` [meta-ti] " Beleswar Prasad Padhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250410164334.GH13634@denix.org \
    --to=denis@denix.org \
    --cc=a-limaye@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=b-padhi@ti.com \
    --cc=denys@konsulko.com \
    --cc=meta-ti@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    --cc=reatmon@ti.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    --cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.