From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <horms@kernel.org>, <sdf@fomichev.me>,
<hramamurthy@google.com>, <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
<jdamato@fastly.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for qstats in ops locked drivers
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 16:46:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410164614.407e6d98@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2768226-854e-464d-8e76-240f7c76e987@intel.com>
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 22:23:28 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > +struct netdev_stat_ops
> > +----------------------
> > +
> > +"qstat" ops are invoked under the instance lock for "ops locked" drivers,
> > +and under rtnl_lock for all other drivers.
> > +
> > struct net_shaper_ops
> > ---------------------
> >
>
> What determines if a driver is "ops locked"? Is that defined above this
> chunk in the doc? I see its when netdev_need_ops_lock() is set? Ok.
Yup, it was hiding in the previous patch:
Code comments and docs refer to drivers which have ops called under
the instance lock as "ops locked".
> Sounds like it would be good to start migrating drivers over to this
> locking paradigm over time.
At least for the drivers which implement queue stats its nice to be able
to dump stats without taking the global lock.
> > if (ifindex) {
> > - netdev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifindex);
> > - if (netdev && netdev->stat_ops) {
> > + netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(net, ifindex);
> > + if (!netdev) {
> > + NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack,
> > + info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QSTATS_IFINDEX]);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
>
> I guess netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat acquires the lock when it
> returns success?
Yes.
> > + if (netdev->stat_ops) {
> > err = netdev_nl_qstats_get_dump_one(netdev, scope, skb,
> > info, ctx);
> > } else {
> > NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(info->extack,
> > info->attrs[NETDEV_A_QSTATS_IFINDEX]);
> > - err = netdev ? -EOPNOTSUPP : -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > - } else {
>
> But there's an else branch here so now I'm confused with how this
> locking works.
The diff is really hard to read, sorry, I should have done two patches.
The else branch is _removed_. The code is now:
if (ifindex) {
netdev = netdev_get_by_index_lock_ops_compat(net, ifindex);
...
netdev_unlock_ops_compat(netdev);
return ;
}
for_each_lock_scoped() {
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 19:59 [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/8] net: avoid potential race between netdev_get_by_index_lock() and netns switch Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/8] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/8] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] xdp: double protect netdev->xdp_flags with netdev->lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-08 22:15 ` Harshitha Ramamurthy
2025-04-09 18:40 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for xdp features Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-10 17:10 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-11 2:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 2:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 17:41 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-04-11 19:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 2:36 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/8] docs: netdev: break down the instance locking info per ops struct Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-09 2:59 ` Joe Damato
2025-04-10 6:01 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-10 16:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-10 22:35 ` Keller, Jacob E
2025-04-10 23:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-11 21:26 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-08 19:59 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] netdev: depend on netdev->lock for qstats in ops locked drivers Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-10 5:23 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-10 23:46 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-11 21:29 ` Jacob Keller
2025-04-10 0:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/8] net: depend on instance lock for queue related netlink ops patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250410164614.407e6d98@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=hramamurthy@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.