All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: namhyung@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix BUG_ON in basic block processing
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 11:38:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250410183852.872311-1-ak@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Hit with perf annotate --code-with-type --stdio

perf: util/annotate-data.c:1299: find_data_type_insn: Assertion
`!(bb->begin->al.offset == -1 || bb->end->al.offset == -1)' failed.

This makes sure to skip non instruction disasm lines in all cases that
add basic blocks. Also added some extra BUG_ONs for this case.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c | 10 +++++++++-
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c      |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
index c3ffb8cad4fc..51ca86ef2677 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
@@ -986,7 +986,15 @@ static void prepend_basic_blocks(struct list_head *this_blocks,
 	}
 
 	/* Point to the insn before the last when adding this block to full_blocks */
-	last_bb->end = list_prev_entry(last_bb->end, al.node);
+	do {
+		/* Nothing useful found */
+		if (last_bb->end == last_bb->begin) {
+			list_del(&last_bb->list);
+			free(last_bb);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		last_bb->end = list_prev_entry(last_bb->end, al.node);
+	} while (last_bb->end->al.offset == -1);
 
 out:
 	list_splice(this_blocks, full_blocks);
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 18ce9f37053e..1c226f257245 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -2966,6 +2966,7 @@ static int add_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
 
 	if (dl == NULL)
 		return -1;
+	BUG_ON(dl->al.offset == -1);
 
 	if (!is_new_basic_block(bb_data, dl))
 		return 0;
@@ -3006,7 +3007,7 @@ static bool process_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
 
 	last_dl = list_last_entry(&notes->src->source,
 				  struct disasm_line, al.node);
-	if (last_dl->al.offset == -1)
+	while (last_dl && last_dl->al.offset == -1)
 		last_dl = annotation__prev_asm_line(notes, last_dl);
 
 	if (last_dl == NULL)
@@ -3052,6 +3053,7 @@ static bool process_basic_block(struct basic_block_data *bb_data,
 		break;
 
 	}
+	BUG_ON(dl->al.offset == -1);
 	link->bb->end = dl;
 	return found;
 }
-- 
2.49.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-10 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 18:38 Andi Kleen [this message]
2025-04-11 21:45 ` [PATCH] perf annotate: Fix BUG_ON in basic block processing Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250410183852.872311-1-ak@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.