All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 2/2] evaluate: restrict allowed subtypes of concatenations
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:48:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250411094820.GA26374@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_jkfafmlGedPQ-H@calendula>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> I am in the need for such a context for payload/meta statements.
> 
>         meta mark set ip dscp map ...
>                       ^^^^^^^
> 
> in this case, ip dscp needs to be evaluated as a key for lookups,
> shift can probably be removed for implicit maps.
> 
> While in this case:
> 
>         meta mark set ip dscp
>                       ^^^^^^^
> 
> in this case, ip dscp needs the shift.
> 
> Then, there is:
> 
>         ip dscp set meta mark
>         ^^^^^^^
> 
> (note: this is not yet supported)
> 
> where ip dscp needs to expand to 16-bit because of the kernel
> checksum routine requirements.
> 
> They are all payload expressions, but evaluation needs to be slightly
> different depending on how the expression is used.
> 
> This context should help disentangle evaluation, evaluation is making
> assumption based on subtle hints, I think there is a need for more
> explicit hints.

Agreed.

> We can revisit in a few weeks, otherwise take this.

OK, lets keep this back for now; technically I don't need
to know the recursion depth, I need to know the placement
(lhs / lookup key resp. rhs / element key) to figure out what
restrictions apply.

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-11  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-02 14:50 [PATCH nft 1/2] evaluate: rename recursion counter to recursion.binop Florian Westphal
2025-04-02 14:50 ` [PATCH nft 2/2] evaluate: restrict allowed subtypes of concatenations Florian Westphal
2025-04-10 22:50   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-11  5:52     ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-11  9:44       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-11  9:48         ` Florian Westphal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250411094820.GA26374@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.