All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cel@kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6.12] nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register()
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 12:47:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250412123343-3854ac696f2b3a1c@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250411141611.27150-1-cel@kernel.org>

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 930b64ca0c511521f0abdd1d57ce52b2a6e3476b

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: cel@kernel.org
Commit author: Jeff Layton<jlayton@kernel.org>

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.14.y | Present (different SHA1: 9d9456185fd5)
6.13.y | Not found

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  930b64ca0c511 ! 1:  7d53ffdf10e3f nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register()
    @@ Metadata
      ## Commit message ##
         nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register()
     
    +    [ Upstream commit 930b64ca0c511521f0abdd1d57ce52b2a6e3476b ]
    +
         Currently, nfsd_proc_stat_init() ignores the return value of
         svc_proc_register(). If the procfile creation fails, then the kernel
         will WARN when it tries to remove the entry later.
    @@ fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c: static __net_init int nfsd_net_init(struct net *net)
      	seqlock_init(&nn->writeverf_lock);
     -	nfsd_proc_stat_init(net);
      #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_LOCALIO)
    - 	spin_lock_init(&nn->local_clients_lock);
      	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->local_clients);
      #endif
      	return 0;
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.12.y       |  Success    |  Success   |

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-13 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-11 14:16 [PATCH v6.12] nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register() cel
2025-04-13 16:47 ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250412123343-3854ac696f2b3a1c@stable.kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.