All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Sergio Perez Gonzalez <sperezglz@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Decouple slab_debug and no_hash_pointers
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:00:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504150956.9AFF9545@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_0AFjai6Bvg-YLD@pathway.suse.cz>

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 02:31:42PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Thu 2025-04-10 10:44:31, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Some system owners use slab_debug=FPZ (or similar) as a hardening option,
> > but do not want to be forced into having kernel addresses exposed due
> > to the implicit "no_hash_pointers" boot param setting.[1]
> > 
> > Introduce the "hash_pointers" boot param, which defaults to "auto"
> > (the current behavior), but also includes "always" (forcing on hashing
> > even when "slab_debug=..." is defined), and "never". The existing
> > "no_hash_pointers" boot param becomes an alias for "hash_pointers=never".
> > 
> > This makes it possible to boot with "slab_debug=FPZ hash_pointers=always".
> 
> The idea makes sense. But it seems that the patch did not handle
> the "always" mode correctly, see below.

Actually, it was the "never" mode that was being ignored. Whoops! (The
double negation language is a little odd.) I've fixed this for v2 with
an explicit switch statement.

> > -int __init no_hash_pointers_enable(char *str)
> > +void __init hash_pointers_finalize(bool slub_debug)
> >  {
> > -	if (no_hash_pointers)
> > -		return 0;
> > +	if (hash_pointers_mode == HASH_PTR_AUTO && slub_debug)
> > +		no_hash_pointers = true;
> >  
> > -	no_hash_pointers = true;
> > +	if (!no_hash_pointers)
> > +		return;
> >  
> >  	pr_warn("**********************************************************\n");
> >  	pr_warn("**   NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE NOTICE   **\n");
> 
> 
> The mode/policy is generic but this function is ready to be called
> only once. And we might actually want to call it twice, see below.

I'd like to keep it a single call. I feel this simplifies the reporting
logic, keeps the selection logic in one place, and allows us to
trivially examine that it is safe to use with __init.

Thanks for the review!

-- 
Kees Cook

      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-15 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-10 17:44 [PATCH] slab: Decouple slab_debug and no_hash_pointers Kees Cook
2025-04-11  7:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-04-13 23:00 ` David Rientjes
2025-04-13 23:57 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-04-14 12:31 ` Petr Mladek
2025-04-15 17:00   ` Kees Cook [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202504150956.9AFF9545@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=sperezglz@gmail.com \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tamird@gmail.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.