From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBD55253357 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744753390; cv=none; b=FsePltdbOO7I+IEcIwmLWCyz6kwUJhXMTwQJGlUZ94K1I4XKsJPbkX8V101wr7hgwuxjFOvLUzIuX6l9mJgjsdBIH+NuyKoCc+yq9A8XH5Id0IYpjG1E7LYdwS9rRGaFcPjAe34RKrxCyNjDfsM++kJENv1m9l895M9bhS8dgNU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744753390; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/3bzc3ixfwzm/L6mLYb//GnnzjM/yBdgMgzq2p7qILY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kus1fmveLXMb4Ii+SOIVMSLGO7CbVG1cnz0ldy2YAE98S4+cSP3R57EJ82HyOQe/wVuUbidbZqtj4wB07DnattTwNAaIKiA3KYzxT1Eg6MXVYeUuj5kGjveEMx+rqu0+YGJyQu8JkxZI2IirHETinpJj+ntd0YZxc6MD18FA7+s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Vp18C+i8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Vp18C+i8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DAA2EC4CEE7; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 21:43:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1744753389; bh=/3bzc3ixfwzm/L6mLYb//GnnzjM/yBdgMgzq2p7qILY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Vp18C+i81Aw6tO7ryBXmPOeW0cq8qWKwrQF47/9SUPwUisvdRRYu0gM+i6oBXV3r8 j5rSkBJjoTHEckV5+8WOQLh4pJrDA0EDL0ZCKz0mGaH9hxOoNDMjG5uM7KRmBNPIwi sl17ejCwx6DQ7uT/EzoFaB3rdxa3q+9Rv7CT//2oHGJTRNij6dhX+K5mf++iAoX+vG /EbFkTUEMqY4qzbsnOZrkBUgcD59B/fcro0P8SAJMmt+Dw1QDuXJmw6yA0vImWkpaM naLMTdmdvqTRtJGwyGyLnJe16TfdQlpGH8URtQkIZCHG/eAXKsblgVsmlwADzIyGRE HgpQNgUySb7Rg== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Cliff Liu , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15.y] smb: client: fix potential UAF in is_valid_oplock_break() Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:43:07 -0400 Message-Id: <20250415112449-0d403bda217b21ea@stable.kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250415020212.320762-1-donghua.liu@windriver.com> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit [ Sasha's backport helper bot ] Hi, ✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter. The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 69ccf040acddf33a3a85ec0f6b45ef84b0f7ec29 WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: Cliff Liu Commit author: Paulo Alcantara Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1) 6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 0a15ba88a32f) 6.1.y | Present (different SHA1: 494c91e1e941) Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: 69ccf040acddf < -: ------------- smb: client: fix potential UAF in is_valid_oplock_break() -: ------------- > 1: 9bdb460b7ab1a smb: client: fix potential UAF in is_valid_oplock_break() --- Results of testing on various branches: | Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-5.15.y | Success | Success |