From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: POPESCU Catalin <catalin.popescu@leica-geosystems.com>
Cc: Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo2@yeah.net>,
"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
"s.hauer@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"festevam@gmail.com" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"m.felsch@pengutronix.de" <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>,
GEO-CHHER-bsp-development
<bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com>,
"stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com" <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait"
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 18:52:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250415155239.GH9439@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415154724.GG9439@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 06:47:26PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Catalin,
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:42:22PM +0000, POPESCU Catalin wrote:
> > Hi Jai,
> >
> > This issue was already reported by Stefan. The problem is that I don't
> > have a Debix board to investigate.
> > The main difference b/w WFI and cpu-pd-wait is that the first doesn't
> > call PSCI/TF-A. So, the issue looks to be related to some settings in
> > the TF-A.
>
> Jai, are you using mainline U-Boot and TF-A, or a downstream version of
> either (or both) ?
Actually, same question for Calatin :-)
I'm running mainline U-Boot 2025.01 and TF-A rel_imx_5.4.70_2.3.6 (from
https://github.com/nxp-imx/imx-atf) and don't seem to experience the
issue:
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpuidle/state1/disable
0
0
0
0
$ ping debix
PING debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.03 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.800 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.935 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.902 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.738 ms
64 bytes from debix.farm.ideasonboard.com (192.168.2.230): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.939 ms
> > What I don't get is why I don't see this issue neither on our IMX8MP
> > specific design nor on the EVK, which uses the same PHY as the Debix board.
> >
> > On 14/04/2025 14:07, Jai Luthra wrote:
> > > On Oct 21, 2024 at 17:42:34 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:44:24PM +0200, Catalin Popescu wrote:
> > >>> So far, only WFI is supported on i.MX8mp platform. Add support for
> > >>> deeper cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait" that would allow for better power
> > >>> usage during runtime. This is a port from NXP downstream kernel.
> > >>>
> > > Since the introduction of this patch in mainline, I am facing sluggish
> > > network performance with my Debix Model-A board with i.MX8mp SoC.
> > >
> > > The network latency jumps to >1s after almost every other packet:
> > >
> > > PING debix (10.0.42.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1008 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.488 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1025 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.810 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=590 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.351 ms
> > > ^C
> > > --- debix ping statistics ---
> > > 7 packets transmitted, 6 received, 14.2857% packet loss, time 6126ms
> > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.351/437.416/1024.755/459.370 ms, pipe 2
> > > darkapex at freya in ~
> > >
> > > If I revert the patch, or disable the deeper cpuidle state through
> > > sysfs, the issue goes away.
> > >
> > > # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$i/cpuidle/state1/disable
> > >
> > > PING debix (10.0.42.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.482 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.28 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.26 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.848 ms
> > > 64 bytes from debix (10.0.42.5): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.406 ms
> > > ^C
> > > --- debix ping statistics ---
> > > 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4051ms
> > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.406/1.255/2.280/0.842 ms
> > >
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Catalin Popescu <catalin.popescu@leica-geosystems.com>
> > >>
> > >> Applied, thanks!
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 13:44 [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add cpuidle state "cpu-pd-wait" Catalin Popescu
2024-10-21 9:42 ` Shawn Guo
2025-04-14 12:07 ` Jai Luthra
2025-04-15 15:42 ` POPESCU Catalin
2025-04-15 15:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-04-15 15:52 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2025-04-15 18:14 ` Marco Felsch
2025-04-15 23:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-04-16 4:59 ` Jai Luthra
2025-04-16 8:46 ` Jai Luthra
2025-04-16 6:57 ` POPESCU Catalin
2025-04-16 17:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-10-23 8:59 ` POPESCU Catalin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250415155239.GH9439@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com \
--cc=catalin.popescu@leica-geosystems.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.felsch@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo2@yeah.net \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.