From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB399C369B1 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D533CB95A for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:41:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB31C3CB56D for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:41:03 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: in-4.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101501000963 for ; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:41:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3D51F461; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:41:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1744792861; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0E0Z+vWx6OUOKS1JEQkwVrhP2882TSMKHj+H1oAUFC0=; b=naAyw6UZO8eGvQktu4e9KlKhd65DNKiScMSorNok+5ttmX31vzoPr9K9k/OqugKJBQkUMt WNSDzEqOvdiAARtjqNQ7i0xx5BFjGF5xQt1D4xSQA9n4QmFA8/SFF55UQLxgQApMOWkLK2 68p2qL5ouv6y1OiLAmEC+0sjwop8lnY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1744792861; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0E0Z+vWx6OUOKS1JEQkwVrhP2882TSMKHj+H1oAUFC0=; b=E//UdAONFZ9hjZ5XguxIzoVYS36HCp1jhJpBmpTewbhq0pUrU4CW4dwNe/z8E+q8WhulTQ trfX+D+pGiqvZMCQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1744792861; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0E0Z+vWx6OUOKS1JEQkwVrhP2882TSMKHj+H1oAUFC0=; b=naAyw6UZO8eGvQktu4e9KlKhd65DNKiScMSorNok+5ttmX31vzoPr9K9k/OqugKJBQkUMt WNSDzEqOvdiAARtjqNQ7i0xx5BFjGF5xQt1D4xSQA9n4QmFA8/SFF55UQLxgQApMOWkLK2 68p2qL5ouv6y1OiLAmEC+0sjwop8lnY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1744792861; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0E0Z+vWx6OUOKS1JEQkwVrhP2882TSMKHj+H1oAUFC0=; b=E//UdAONFZ9hjZ5XguxIzoVYS36HCp1jhJpBmpTewbhq0pUrU4CW4dwNe/z8E+q8WhulTQ trfX+D+pGiqvZMCQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E092139A1; Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 3TdKFB1t/2dYYwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:41:01 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:40:57 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Message-ID: <20250416084057.GB577362@pevik> References: <20250416072113.573818-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.50 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:replyto,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] cgroup_lib.sh: Improve error messages X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi Li, > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup_lib.sh > > @@ -119,12 +119,12 @@ cgroup_require() > > ret=$? > > if [ $ret -eq 32 ]; then > > - tst_brk TCONF "'tst_cgctl require' exited. Controller is > > probably not available?" > > + tst_brk TCONF "'tst_cgctl require $ctrl' exited. $ctrl > > controller not available?" > s/exited/existed I understood that "exited" which was used previously was meant to be "exited with non-zero" (I can improve it this way to be more precise). Do you really think it's in TCONF related to controller existed? I actually mean the opposite - one wants controller which does not exist due not configured in the kernel. Kind regards, Petr > > return $ret > > fi > > if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then > > - tst_brk TBROK "'tst_cgctl require' exited" > > + tst_brk TBROK "'tst_cgctl require $ctrl' failed. LTP > > missing $ctrl controller support?" > > return $ret > > fi -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp