Re: PREEMPT_RT testing on kernelci

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>]

On 2025-04-17 10:10:43 [-0300], Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 
> 
> ---- On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 07:04:10 -0300 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote ---
> 
>  > On 2025-04-14 12:14:44 [-0300], Gustavo Padovan wrote: 
>  > > Hi Sebastian, 
>  > Hi Gustavo, 
>  >  
>  > > In my understanding you want to know when results for any rt-tests change status (eg PASS -> FAIL or 
>  > > vice versa) for a selection of trees (eg mainline, next, etc). Can you confirm? 
>  >  
>  > The results change is definitely interesting. The other thing is what is 
>  > tested and how. I remember you added/ changed some architectures for the 
>  > RT subset. I also assume that warnings at bootime (as in lockdep or 
>  > general warnings) are reported. 
> 
> We have some support around that, but this work is still evolving.

Okay.

>  > I remember Daniel asked for some cyclictests/rt-tests integration so I 
>  > don't know what is tested here ;) 
>  >  
>  > From the commandline you sent that there are a few boards running the 
>  > cyclictests and everything either passes or is in state "INCONCLUSIVE". 
>  > So this looks nice. 
> 
> Okay.
> 
> As for notifications, for which trees/branches you want to see it?

Linus' master and the -next tree would be good. If you plan add to add
Cc here, it would be nice if you could add linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev

Sebastian