From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C93AC2571DE; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.245 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744914033; cv=none; b=FNBb6C7zZofNud2lFW0aUZoBw9fpAjDQcDLRItrYeOJ0Qi81tdezuWf7t6F3zWU7bMIM4OQLG00m5EiDsfR2PC5zEODG6w83A/P5bgIbFCCeeSW+sLZYer6XbBlSGlPk2ytNDdGvyfG7uusLt6RG3sJyr6dieW4VMXtq7Q4BZPA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744914033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8UAUurNvQFH1WUKwRz6lzOitiyR5mJuyfhRL1iygvr4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qJIaxoKz4vC4W3bghYkMQES327hvp77T0qniUYzCin+KrC9wPb1LLKOyzPwGWDkwoAF3HGoHDH58Er9uqC/rrg9VolZwLNFBqUjfiA5xmpdWgeWvW8HU4FH1GRY3qnaZrLSZjEs6CZ+3OUCCo6IetHI1+gGY8sw3CntYiQ5U+8U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=DT2SSWH2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.245 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="DT2SSWH2" Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllvem-ot03.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 53HIKAEM089132 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:20:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1744914010; bh=aDkinX0HmCTbsh8Rto3ZP0jmZu3BXU4f2JX1EGxCDoI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=DT2SSWH211Y796t2wUER1kV3ihNNPm94AxnH/XVYKkhiZUqlHCti25Gf3Y/Jibamk 5n7xnvIWNawS5LKp4rd3UbCzgttOC4wJPKxSmwDO1qbwE2cyWiMI4o02sc7/kIrc/Y jiMtBN3OhVOxMvgdm1zviQyybte5oK6yPOudgBrI= Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (dlee111.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.22]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 53HIKAqO022361 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:20:10 -0500 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:20:09 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:20:10 -0500 Received: from uda0510294.dhcp.ti.com (uda0510294.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.227.151]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 53HIK1Hj071102; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:20:06 -0500 From: Beleswar Padhi To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v10 01/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Drop check performed in k3_r5_rproc_{mbox_callback/kick} Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 23:49:29 +0530 Message-ID: <20250417182001.3903905-2-b-padhi@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20250417182001.3903905-1-b-padhi@ti.com> References: <20250417182001.3903905-1-b-padhi@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea From: Siddharth Vadapalli Commit f3f11cfe8907 ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Acquire mailbox handle during probe routine") introduced a check in the "k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback()" and "k3_r5_rproc_kick()" callbacks, causing them to exit if the remote core's state is "RPROC_DETACHED". However, the "__rproc_attach()" function that is responsible for attaching to a remote core, updates the state of the remote core to "RPROC_ATTACHED" only after invoking "rproc_start_subdevices()". The "rproc_start_subdevices()" function triggers the probe of the Virtio RPMsg devices associated with the remote core, which require that the "k3_r5_rproc_kick()" and "k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback()" callbacks are functional. Hence, drop the check in the callbacks. Fixes: f3f11cfe8907 ("remoteproc: k3-r5: Acquire mailbox handle during probe routine") Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi --- v10: Changelog: 1. Re-ordered this patch to come at the start of the series. Link to v9: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250317120622.1746415-7-b-padhi@ti.com/ drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c index dbc513c5569cb..3fc0b97dec600 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -194,10 +194,6 @@ static void k3_r5_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data) const char *name = kproc->rproc->name; u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data); - /* Do not forward message from a detached core */ - if (kproc->rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) - return; - dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg); switch (msg) { @@ -233,10 +229,6 @@ static void k3_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid; int ret; - /* Do not forward message to a detached core */ - if (kproc->rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) - return; - /* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */ ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg); if (ret < 0) -- 2.34.1