From: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
To: <andersson@kernel.org>, <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: <afd@ti.com>, <hnagalla@ti.com>, <u-kumar1@ti.com>, <jm@ti.com>,
<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
<jkangas@redhat.com>, <eballetbo@redhat.com>, <b-padhi@ti.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 19/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_request_mbox() implementations into common driver
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 23:49:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250417182001.3903905-20-b-padhi@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417182001.3903905-1-b-padhi@ti.com>
The rproc_request_mbox() implementations in TI K3 R5, DSP and M4
remoteproc drivers acquire the mailbox channel and send the same message
through the acquired channel.
Refactor the above function into the ti_k3_common.c driver as
k3_rproc_request_mbox() and use it throughout R5, DSP and M4 drivers.
Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@ti.com>
---
v10: Changelog:
1. Split [v9 14/26] into [v10 18/33] and [v10 19/33] patches.
Link to v9:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250317120622.1746415-15-b-padhi@ti.com/
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h | 1 +
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 36 +---------------------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 37 +----------------------
drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 37 +----------------------
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
index 011a871860754..313f3695bf2ec 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.c
@@ -157,5 +157,41 @@ int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_rproc_release);
+int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+ struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
+ struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+ int ret;
+
+ client->dev = dev;
+ client->tx_done = NULL;
+ client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
+ client->tx_block = false;
+ client->knows_txdone = false;
+
+ kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
+ "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
+ * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
+ *
+ * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
+ * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
+ */
+ ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
+ mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(k3_rproc_request_mbox);
+
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 common Remoteproc code");
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
index c1af39cd288c1..721492fa0fb71 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_common.h
@@ -92,4 +92,5 @@ void k3_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data);
void k3_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid);
int k3_rproc_reset(struct k3_rproc *kproc);
int k3_rproc_release(struct k3_rproc *kproc);
+int k3_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc);
#endif /* REMOTEPROC_TI_K3_COMMON_H */
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
index 577dcd65093a9..d1d35f819c232 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
@@ -24,40 +24,6 @@
#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK (SZ_16M - 1)
-static int k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
- struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
- struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
- struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
- int ret;
-
- client->dev = dev;
- client->tx_done = NULL;
- client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
- client->tx_block = false;
- client->knows_txdone = false;
-
- kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
- "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
-
- /*
- * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
- * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
- *
- * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
- * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
- */
- ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret));
- mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
- return ret;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
/*
* The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
* generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal
@@ -443,7 +409,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
kproc->dev = dev;
kproc->data = data;
- ret = k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+ ret = k3_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
index a59fa835d8de6..15e7943a12c14 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
@@ -21,41 +21,6 @@
#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
#include "ti_k3_common.h"
-static int k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
- struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
- struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
- struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
- int ret;
-
- client->dev = dev;
- client->tx_done = NULL;
- client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
- client->tx_block = false;
- client->knows_txdone = false;
-
- kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
- "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
-
- /*
- * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
- * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
- *
- * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
- * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
- */
- ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
- mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
- return ret;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* The M4 cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
* generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the internal
@@ -499,7 +464,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_info(dev, "configured M4F for remoteproc mode\n");
}
- ret = k3_m4_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+ ret = k3_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index dedc9456983e0..6177610d63980 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -284,41 +284,6 @@ static inline int k3_r5_core_run(struct k3_rproc *kproc)
0, PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT);
}
-static int k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc)
-{
- struct k3_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
- struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
- struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
- int ret;
-
- client->dev = dev;
- client->tx_done = NULL;
- client->rx_callback = k3_rproc_mbox_callback;
- client->tx_block = false;
- client->knows_txdone = false;
-
- kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox))
- return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox),
- "mbox_request_channel failed\n");
-
- /*
- * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
- * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
- *
- * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
- * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
- */
- ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
- mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
- return ret;
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* The R5F cores have controls for both a reset and a halt/run. The code
* execution from DDR requires the initial boot-strapping code to be run
@@ -1357,7 +1322,7 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
kproc = core->kproc;
rproc = kproc->rproc;
- ret = k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
+ ret = k3_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 18:19 [PATCH v10 00/33] Refactor TI K3 R5, DSP and M4 Remoteproc Drivers Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 01/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Drop check performed in k3_r5_rproc_{mbox_callback/kick} Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 02/33] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Drop check performed in k3_dsp_rproc_{mbox_callback/kick} Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 03/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Refactor sequential core power up/down operations Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 04/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Re-order internal memory initialization functions Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 05/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Re-order k3_r5_release_tsp() function Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 06/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Refactor Data Structures to Align with DSP and M4 Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 07/33] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use k3_r5_rproc_mem_data structure for memory info Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 08/33] remoteproc: k3-{m4/dsp}: Add a void ptr member in rproc internal struct Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 09/33] remoteproc: k3-m4: Add pointer to rproc struct within k3_m4_rproc Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 10/33] remoteproc: k3-m4: Use k3_rproc_mem_data structure for memory info Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 11/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor shared data structures Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 12/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor mailbox rx_callback functions into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 13/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .kick rproc ops " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-21 14:58 ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-22 5:55 ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 14/33] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Correct Reset logic for devices without lresets Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 15/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_reset() implementation into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-21 14:42 ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-22 5:53 ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-04-22 14:21 ` Andrew Davis
2025-04-23 8:24 ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 16/33] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Correct Reset deassert logic for devices w/o lresets Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 17/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor rproc_release() implementation into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 18/33] remoteproc: k3-m4: Ping the mbox while acquiring the channel Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` Beleswar Padhi [this message]
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 20/33] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Don't override rproc ops in IPC-only mode Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 21/33] remoteproc: k3-dsp: Assert local reset during .prepare callback Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 22/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .prepare rproc ops into common driver Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 23/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .unprepare " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 24/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .start " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 25/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .stop " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 26/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .attach " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 27/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .detach " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 28/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .get_loaded_rsc_table " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 29/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor .da_to_va rproc " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 30/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor of_get_memories() functions " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:19 ` [PATCH v10 31/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor mem_release() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v10 32/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor reserved_mem_init() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-17 18:20 ` [PATCH v10 33/33] remoteproc: k3: Refactor release_tsp() " Beleswar Padhi
2025-04-23 21:06 ` [PATCH v10 00/33] Refactor TI K3 R5, DSP and M4 Remoteproc Drivers Judith Mendez
2025-04-24 3:48 ` Beleswar Prasad Padhi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250417182001.3903905-20-b-padhi@ti.com \
--to=b-padhi@ti.com \
--cc=afd@ti.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=eballetbo@redhat.com \
--cc=hnagalla@ti.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jkangas@redhat.com \
--cc=jm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.