Re: [PATCH 0/8] iio: more timestamp alignment

[Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>]

On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:52:32 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:

> Wile reviewing [1], I noticed a few more cases where we can use
> aligned_s64 or need __aligned(8) on data structures used with
> iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp().
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20250413103443.2420727-1-jic23@kernel.org/
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>

I have a bunch of these in a 'too hard before sending that patch
pile' as well.  Hopefully you've covered many of those :) There
were definitely more bugs than I expected to see when I started that
effort!  I thought we'd tracked all these down long ago :(

Jonathan

> ---
> David Lechner (8):
>       iio: adc: dln2-adc: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
>       iio: adc: mt6360-adc: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
>       iio: addac: ad74413r: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
>       iio: chemical: pms7003: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
>       iio: chemical: sps30: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
>       iio: imu: adis16550: align buffers for timestamp
>       iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: align buffer for timestamp
>       iio: pressure: mprls0025pa: use aligned_s64 for timestamp
> 
>  drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel.h           | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/adc/dln2-adc.c                 | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/adc/mt6360-adc.c               | 4 ++--
>  drivers/iio/addac/ad74413r.c               | 5 +++--
>  drivers/iio/chemical/pms7003.c             | 5 +++--
>  drivers/iio/chemical/sps30.c               | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/imu/adis16550.c                | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_ring.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/iio/pressure/mprls0025pa.h         | 2 +-
>  9 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 3159d40a2ca0ae14e69e1cae8b12f04c933d0445
> change-id: 20250416-iio-more-timestamp-alignment-6c6c6a87ebda
> 
> Best regards,