[Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>]

From bda8bb8011d865cebf066350c8625e8be1625656 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 15:22:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/1] bpf: use proper type to calculate
 bpf_raw_tp_null_args.mask index

The calculation of the index used to access the mask field in 'struct
bpf_raw_tp_null_args' is done with 'int' type, which could overflow when
the tracepoint being attached has more than 8 arguments.

While none of the tracepoints mentioned in raw_tp_null_args[] currently
have more than 8 arguments, there do exist tracepoints that had more
than 8 arguments (e.g. iocost_iocg_forgive_debt), so use the correct
type for calculation and avoid Smatch static checker warning.

Cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/843a3b94-d53d-42db-93d4-be10a4090146@stanley.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 16ba36f34dfa..656ee11aff67 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -6829,10 +6829,10 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
 			/* Is this a func with potential NULL args? */
 			if (strcmp(tname, raw_tp_null_args[i].func))
 				continue;
-			if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x1 << (arg * 4)))
+			if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x1ULL << (arg * 4)))
 				info->reg_type |= PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
 			/* Is the current arg IS_ERR? */
-			if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x2 << (arg * 4)))
+			if (raw_tp_null_args[i].mask & (0x2ULL << (arg * 4)))
 				ptr_err_raw_tp = true;
 			break;
 		}
-- 
2.49.0