All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	jack@suse.cz, cem@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	catherine.hoang@oracle.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/14] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic()
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2025 21:00:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250421040002.GU25675@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415121425.4146847-12-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:14:22PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() for dedicated handling of atomic writes.
> 
> The function works based on two operating modes:
> - HW offload, i.e. REQ_ATOMIC-based
> - CoW based with out-of-places write and atomic extent remapping
> 
> The preferred method is HW offload as it will be faster. If HW offload is
> not possible, then we fallback to the CoW-based method.
> 
> HW offload would not be possible for the write length exceeding the HW
> offload limit, the write spanning multiple extents, unaligned disk blocks,
> etc.
> 
> Apart from the write exceeding the HW offload limit, other conditions for
> HW offload can only be detected in the iomap handling for the write. As
> such, we use a fallback method to issue the write if we detect in the
> ->iomap_begin() handler that HW offload is not possible. Special code
> -ENOPROTOOPT is returned from ->iomap_begin() to inform that HW offload
> not possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index ba4b02abc6e4..81a377f65aa3 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -728,6 +728,72 @@ xfs_file_dio_write_zoned(
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Handle block atomic writes
> + *
> + * Two methods of atomic writes are supported:
> + * - REQ_ATOMIC-based, which would typically use some form of HW offload in the
> + *   disk
> + * - COW-based, which uses a COW fork as a staging extent for data updates
> + *   before atomically updating extent mappings for the range being written
> + *
> + */
> +static noinline ssize_t
> +xfs_file_dio_write_atomic(
> +	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
> +	struct kiocb		*iocb,
> +	struct iov_iter		*from)
> +{
> +	unsigned int		iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
> +	ssize_t			ret, ocount = iov_iter_count(from);
> +	const struct iomap_ops	*dops;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * HW offload should be faster, so try that first if it is already
> +	 * known that the write length is not too large.
> +	 */
> +	if (ocount > xfs_inode_buftarg(ip)->bt_bdev_awu_max)
> +		dops = &xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_ops;
> +	else
> +		dops = &xfs_direct_write_iomap_ops;
> +
> +retry:
> +	ret = xfs_ilock_iocb_for_write(iocb, &iolock);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = xfs_file_write_checks(iocb, from, &iolock, NULL);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out_unlock;
> +
> +	/* Demote similar to xfs_file_dio_write_aligned() */
> +	if (iolock == XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL) {
> +		xfs_ilock_demote(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
> +		iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
> +	}
> +
> +	trace_xfs_file_direct_write(iocb, from);
> +	ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, dops, &xfs_dio_write_ops,
> +			0, NULL, 0);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The retry mechanism is based on the ->iomap_begin method returning
> +	 * -ENOPROTOOPT, which would be when the REQ_ATOMIC-based write is not
> +	 * possible. The REQ_ATOMIC-based method typically not be possible if
> +	 * the write spans multiple extents or the disk blocks are misaligned.
> +	 */
> +	if (ret == -ENOPROTOOPT && dops == &xfs_direct_write_iomap_ops) {
> +		xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
> +		dops = &xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_ops;
> +		goto retry;
> +	}
> +
> +out_unlock:
> +	if (iolock)
> +		xfs_iunlock(ip, iolock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Handle block unaligned direct I/O writes
>   *
> @@ -843,6 +909,8 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
>  		return xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned(ip, iocb, from);
>  	if (xfs_is_zoned_inode(ip))
>  		return xfs_file_dio_write_zoned(ip, iocb, from);

What happens to an IOCB_ATOMIC write to a zoned file?  I think the
ioend for an atomic write to a zoned file involves a similar change as
an outofplace atomic write to a file (one big transaction to absorb
all the mapping changes) but I don't think the zoned code quite does
that...?

--D

> +	if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC)
> +		return xfs_file_dio_write_atomic(ip, iocb, from);
>  	return xfs_file_dio_write_aligned(ip, iocb, from,
>  			&xfs_direct_write_iomap_ops, &xfs_dio_write_ops, NULL);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21  4:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15 12:14 [PATCH v7 00/14] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] fs: add atomic write unit max opt to statx John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] xfs: add helpers to compute log item overhead John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] xfs: add helpers to compute transaction reservation for finishing intent items John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] xfs: rename xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite() -> xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] xfs: refine atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] xfs: add xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] xfs: add large atomic writes checks in xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-15 17:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 17:46     ` John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-04-21  4:00   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-04-21  5:47     ` John Garry
2025-04-21 16:42       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23  5:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23  8:19           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23 14:51             ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-23 14:53           ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-21 21:18   ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-22  6:08     ` John Garry
2025-04-23  5:18       ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-23  7:08         ` John Garry
2025-04-23  7:36           ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-23  5:44       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-23  7:02         ` John Garry
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] xfs: add xfs_compute_atomic_write_unit_max() John Garry
2025-04-15 16:25   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 16:35     ` John Garry
2025-04-15 16:39       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] xfs: update atomic write limits John Garry
2025-04-15 16:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 12:14 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] xfs: allow sysadmins to specify a maximum atomic write limit at mount time John Garry
2025-04-15 15:35   ` Randy Dunlap
2025-04-15 16:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-15 22:36   ` [PATCH v7.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-16 10:08     ` John Garry
2025-04-16 16:26       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250421040002.GU25675@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.