All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Amit Shah <amit.shah@amd.com>,
	"Nikolay Borisov" <nik.borisov@suse.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [x86/bugs]  27ce8299bc:  netperf.Throughput_tps 23.1% improvement
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 13:48:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504211337.3c954295-lkp@intel.com> (raw)



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed a 23.1% improvement of netperf.Throughput_tps on:


commit: 27ce8299bc1ec6df8306073785ff82b30b3cc5ee ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on context switch with eIBRS")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master


testcase: netperf
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 192 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8468V  CPU @ 2.4GHz (Sapphire Rapids) with 384G memory
parameters:

	ip: ipv4
	runtime: 300s
	nr_threads: 50%
	cluster: cs-localhost
	test: TCP_RR
	cpufreq_governor: performance


In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:

+------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| testcase: change | stress-ng: stress-ng.sem.sem_wait_calls_per_sec 10.0% improvement                                      |
| test machine     | 224 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CTDX (Sapphire Rapids) with 256G memory            |
| test parameters  | cpufreq_governor=performance                                                                           |
|                  | nr_threads=100%                                                                                        |
|                  | test=sem                                                                                               |
|                  | testtime=60s                                                                                           |
+------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| testcase: change | netperf: netperf.Throughput_Mbps 21.7% improvement                                                     |
| test machine     | 192 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8468V  CPU @ 2.4GHz (Sapphire Rapids) with 384G memory |
| test parameters  | cluster=cs-localhost                                                                                   |
|                  | cpufreq_governor=performance                                                                           |
|                  | ip=ipv4                                                                                                |
|                  | nr_threads=50%                                                                                         |
|                  | runtime=300s                                                                                           |
|                  | send_size=10K                                                                                          |
|                  | test=SCTP_STREAM_MANY                                                                                  |
+------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+




Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->


The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250421/202504211337.3c954295-lkp@intel.com

=========================================================================================
cluster/compiler/cpufreq_governor/ip/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/runtime/tbox_group/test/testcase:
  cs-localhost/gcc-12/performance/ipv4/x86_64-rhel-9.4/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/300s/igk-spr-2sp3/TCP_RR/netperf

commit: 
  18bae0dfec ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on VMEXIT with eIBRS+retpoline")
  27ce8299bc ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on context switch with eIBRS")

18bae0dfec15b24e 27ce8299bc1ec6df8306073785f 
---------------- --------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
 3.017e+09           +23.0%  3.712e+09        cpuidle..usage
      2.10            -0.3        1.78 ±  3%  mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
     59598 ± 76%     +94.3%     115800 ± 48%  numa-numastat.node0.other_node
     59598 ± 76%     +94.3%     115800 ± 48%  numa-vmstat.node0.numa_other
  19701282           +23.3%   24284882        vmstat.system.cs
     18.71 ± 71%    +340.8%      82.47 ± 55%  perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__release_sock.release_sock.tcp_sendmsg.__sys_sendto
      1008 ± 12%     -32.2%     683.24 ± 19%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.kcompactd.kthread.ret_from_fork
     12.40 ± 23%     -62.4%       4.67 ±101%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.shmem_file_write_iter.vfs_write.ksys_write
     63.40 ± 18%     -33.0%      42.50 ± 21%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof.__alloc_skb.tcp_stream_alloc_skb.tcp_sendmsg_locked
     70.40 ± 13%     -30.4%      49.00 ± 10%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.__cond_resched.lock_sock_nested.tcp_sendmsg.__sys_sendto.__x64_sys_sendto
    152.80 ± 15%     -35.0%      99.33 ± 19%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_reschedule_ipi.[unknown].[unknown]
     69.16 ± 47%    +167.8%     185.23 ± 40%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.__cond_resched.__release_sock.release_sock.tcp_sendmsg.__sys_sendto
   5018731           +23.1%    6177264        netperf.ThroughputBoth_total_tps
     52278           +23.1%      64346        netperf.ThroughputBoth_tps
   5018731           +23.1%    6177264        netperf.Throughput_total_tps
     52278           +23.1%      64346        netperf.Throughput_tps
    424880 ±  4%     +56.5%     665128 ±  7%  netperf.time.involuntary_context_switches
      2787            +4.7%       2916        netperf.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
      7940            +5.9%       8407        netperf.time.system_time
    453.82           -17.1%     376.38        netperf.time.user_time
 1.504e+09           +23.1%  1.852e+09        netperf.time.voluntary_context_switches
 1.506e+09           +23.1%  1.853e+09        netperf.workload
   3837554 ±  3%     +14.4%    4388386 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.max
      0.43 ±  2%      +7.4%       0.46 ±  3%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.h_nr_queued.avg
      0.43 ±  2%      +7.2%       0.46 ±  3%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.h_nr_runnable.avg
    318469 ±  8%     +21.0%     385456 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.left_deadline.avg
   3424819           +11.4%    3813991 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.left_deadline.max
    947183 ±  3%     +14.5%    1084809 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.left_deadline.stddev
    318450 ±  8%     +21.0%     385434 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.left_vruntime.avg
   3424623           +11.4%    3813781 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.left_vruntime.max
    947126 ±  3%     +14.5%    1084745 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.left_vruntime.stddev
   3837554 ±  3%     +14.4%    4388386 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
      0.42 ±  2%      +7.0%       0.45 ±  3%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_queued.avg
    318450 ±  8%     +21.0%     385434 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.right_vruntime.avg
   3424623           +11.4%    3813781 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.right_vruntime.max
    947126 ±  3%     +14.5%    1084745 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.right_vruntime.stddev
    131.48 ±  2%     +15.7%     152.16 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.avg
    145.54            +9.8%     159.78 ±  2%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_est.stddev
      4847 ± 11%     -25.5%       3613 ±  9%  sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.min
  15457316           +22.7%   18969638        sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
  16517179           +24.8%   20609615        sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max
  13827971 ±  3%     +15.0%   15900842 ±  5%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
    362618 ±  7%     +75.8%     637634 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
 4.113e+10           +19.5%  4.916e+10        perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
      0.58            -0.3        0.27 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
   2.3e+08           -45.7%  1.248e+08 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.branch-misses
 1.565e+09           +15.1%    1.8e+09        perf-stat.i.cache-references
  19900050           +23.2%   24525361        perf-stat.i.context-switches
      1.56           -12.6%       1.36        perf-stat.i.cpi
 3.248e+11            +6.4%  3.454e+11        perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
    115466 ±  3%     -11.7%     101909 ±  6%  perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
 2.098e+11           +21.3%  2.545e+11        perf-stat.i.instructions
      0.65           +14.1%       0.74        perf-stat.i.ipc
    103.90           +23.1%     127.90        perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
      0.56            -0.3        0.25 ±  2%  perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
      1.55           -12.3%       1.36        perf-stat.overall.cpi
      0.65           +14.1%       0.74        perf-stat.overall.ipc
     42083            -1.7%      41384        perf-stat.overall.path-length
   4.1e+10           +19.5%    4.9e+10        perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
 2.292e+08           -45.7%  1.244e+08 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
 1.559e+09           +15.1%  1.794e+09        perf-stat.ps.cache-references
  19830610           +23.3%   24442385        perf-stat.ps.context-switches
 3.237e+11            +6.4%  3.443e+11        perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
    115199 ±  3%     -11.7%     101743 ±  6%  perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
 2.091e+11           +21.4%  2.537e+11        perf-stat.ps.instructions
 6.336e+13           +21.0%  7.669e+13        perf-stat.total.instructions


***************************************************************************************************
lkp-spr-r02: 224 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CTDX (Sapphire Rapids) with 256G memory
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/testtime:
  gcc-12/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/100%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/lkp-spr-r02/sem/stress-ng/60s

commit: 
  18bae0dfec ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on VMEXIT with eIBRS+retpoline")
  27ce8299bc ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on context switch with eIBRS")

18bae0dfec15b24e 27ce8299bc1ec6df8306073785f 
---------------- --------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
      3242 ±197%    +548.0%      21014 ± 81%  numa-meminfo.node0.AnonHugePages
 1.729e+08           +10.3%  1.908e+08 ±  2%  vmstat.system.cs
      3.00 ± 50%    +122.1%       6.67 ± 37%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_avg.avg
     25.78 ± 25%     +55.0%      39.95 ± 18%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.runnable_avg.stddev
      3.00 ± 50%    +122.1%       6.67 ± 37%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.avg
     25.78 ± 25%     +55.0%      39.95 ± 18%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.removed.util_avg.stddev
  26219071           +11.9%   29350573        sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max
      1.83 ±208%   +1375.8%      27.06 ± 57%  perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
    106.79 ±219%    +711.3%     866.45 ± 39%  perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
      3.68 ±212%   +1369.9%      54.11 ± 57%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
    213.70 ±222%    +710.9%       1732 ± 39%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
      1.90 ±208%   +1321.6%      27.05 ± 57%  perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
    109.49 ±219%    +691.3%     866.45 ± 39%  perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.irqentry_exit_to_user_mode.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.[unknown]
 1.296e+10 ±  2%      +8.7%  1.409e+10        stress-ng.sem.ops
  2.16e+08 ±  2%      +8.7%  2.348e+08        stress-ng.sem.ops_per_sec
    302558           +10.0%     332730        stress-ng.sem.sem_timedwait_calls_per_sec
    301686           +10.0%     331735        stress-ng.sem.sem_trywait_calls_per_sec
    302524           +10.0%     332698        stress-ng.sem.sem_wait_calls_per_sec
  1.09e+10           +10.3%  1.202e+10 ±  2%  stress-ng.time.involuntary_context_switches
      2765            +2.8%       2842        stress-ng.time.user_time
 1.399e+11            +2.0%  1.426e+11        perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
      1.04            -0.7        0.30        perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
  1.42e+09           -71.5%   4.04e+08        perf-stat.i.branch-misses
     31.24 ± 11%      +3.4       34.63 ±  5%  perf-stat.i.cache-miss-rate%
 1.796e+08           +10.2%  1.979e+08 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.context-switches
      0.99            -5.9%       0.93        perf-stat.i.cpi
 6.499e+11            +6.1%  6.894e+11        perf-stat.i.instructions
      1.02            +6.1%       1.08        perf-stat.i.ipc
      1.01            -0.7        0.28        perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
      0.98            -5.7%       0.93        perf-stat.overall.cpi
      1.02            +6.0%       1.08        perf-stat.overall.ipc
 1.376e+11            +2.0%  1.403e+11        perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
  1.39e+09           -71.5%  3.964e+08        perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
 1.757e+08           +10.3%  1.939e+08 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.context-switches
 6.396e+11            +6.0%  6.783e+11        perf-stat.ps.instructions
 3.925e+13            +5.9%  4.156e+13        perf-stat.total.instructions



***************************************************************************************************
igk-spr-2sp3: 192 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8468V  CPU @ 2.4GHz (Sapphire Rapids) with 384G memory
=========================================================================================
cluster/compiler/cpufreq_governor/ip/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/runtime/send_size/tbox_group/test/testcase:
  cs-localhost/gcc-12/performance/ipv4/x86_64-rhel-9.4/50%/debian-12-x86_64-20240206.cgz/300s/10K/igk-spr-2sp3/SCTP_STREAM_MANY/netperf

commit: 
  18bae0dfec ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on VMEXIT with eIBRS+retpoline")
  27ce8299bc ("x86/bugs: Don't fill RSB on context switch with eIBRS")

18bae0dfec15b24e 27ce8299bc1ec6df8306073785f 
---------------- --------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
 1.383e+08 ±  3%     +24.4%  1.721e+08 ±  2%  cpuidle..usage
    154471 ±  4%     +30.1%     200987 ±  6%  meminfo.Shmem
    146073 ±  5%     +30.0%     189902 ±  8%  numa-meminfo.node1.Shmem
      5743 ±  4%     +20.0%       6889 ±  6%  perf-c2c.HITM.local
 3.143e+08 ±  7%     +28.4%  4.035e+08 ±  6%  numa-numastat.node1.local_node
 3.145e+08 ±  7%     +28.4%  4.037e+08 ±  6%  numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit
      0.03            +0.0        0.03        mpstat.cpu.all.irq%
      0.66 ±  3%      +0.1        0.80 ±  2%  mpstat.cpu.all.soft%
      3.31 ±  3%      +0.7        3.97 ±  2%  mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
     36537 ±  5%     +30.0%      47492 ±  7%  numa-vmstat.node1.nr_shmem
 3.145e+08 ±  7%     +28.4%  4.037e+08 ±  6%  numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit
 3.143e+08 ±  7%     +28.4%  4.035e+08 ±  6%  numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local
      9.41 ±  4%     +10.3%      10.37 ±  6%  vmstat.procs.r
    890417 ±  3%     +24.6%    1109662 ±  2%  vmstat.system.cs
     24697 ±  3%     +12.3%      27728 ±  2%  vmstat.system.in
    227082            +5.2%     238914        proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
    917466            +1.3%     929058        proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
     38644 ±  4%     +30.0%      50238 ±  6%  proc-vmstat.nr_shmem
    227082            +5.2%     238914        proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon
 6.489e+08 ±  3%     +21.7%  7.896e+08 ±  2%  proc-vmstat.numa_hit
 6.487e+08 ±  3%     +21.7%  7.892e+08 ±  2%  proc-vmstat.numa_local
 3.735e+09 ±  3%     +21.7%  4.547e+09 ±  2%  proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
 3.735e+09 ±  3%     +21.7%  4.547e+09 ±  2%  proc-vmstat.pgfree
     68149 ±  6%     +31.8%      89840 ±  3%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.avg
     28973 ± 16%     +42.0%      41141 ± 11%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.min
     19941 ±  8%     +22.6%      24454 ±  4%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.avg_vruntime.stddev
     68149 ±  6%     +31.8%      89840 ±  3%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.avg
     28973 ± 16%     +42.0%      41141 ± 11%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
     19941 ±  8%     +22.6%      24454 ±  4%  sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
    697844 ±  3%     +24.1%     866113 ±  2%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
   1574988 ±  4%     +18.8%    1870629 ±  6%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max
    281842 ±  4%     +16.0%     327055 ±  6%  sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
      1432 ±  3%     +21.7%       1742 ±  2%  netperf.ThroughputBoth_Mbps
    137495 ±  3%     +21.7%     167304 ±  2%  netperf.ThroughputBoth_total_Mbps
      1432 ±  3%     +21.7%       1742 ±  2%  netperf.Throughput_Mbps
    137495 ±  3%     +21.7%     167304 ±  2%  netperf.Throughput_total_Mbps
     27575 ±  2%     +22.0%      33655 ±  2%  netperf.time.involuntary_context_switches
    363.00 ±  3%     +21.7%     441.67 ±  2%  netperf.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
      1072 ±  3%     +21.6%       1304 ±  2%  netperf.time.system_time
     23.66 ±  2%     +20.2%      28.44        netperf.time.user_time
    933935            -9.5%     844837        netperf.time.voluntary_context_switches
 5.035e+08 ±  3%     +21.7%  6.127e+08 ±  2%  netperf.workload
      0.04 ± 19%     +45.1%       0.05 ± 15%  perf-sched.sch_delay.avg.ms.wait_for_partner.fifo_open.do_dentry_open.vfs_open
     20.08 ±  6%     -28.0%      14.45 ±  7%  perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
    130158 ±  6%     +39.6%     181663 ±  7%  perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.count.ms
     20.06 ±  6%     -28.0%      14.43 ±  7%  perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
    349.52 ± 19%     -32.0%     237.78 ±  7%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.poll_schedule_timeout.constprop.0.do_poll
      4.13 ±  7%     -31.8%       2.82 ±  8%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sctp_skb_recv_datagram.sctp_recvmsg.inet_recvmsg
     46.67 ± 16%     +42.5%      66.50 ± 11%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.poll_schedule_timeout.constprop.0.do_poll
    112061 ±  7%     +46.7%     164429 ±  8%  perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_timeout.sctp_skb_recv_datagram.sctp_recvmsg.inet_recvmsg
    349.50 ± 19%     -32.0%     237.77 ±  7%  perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.poll_schedule_timeout.constprop.0.do_poll
      4.12 ±  7%     -31.8%       2.81 ±  8%  perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.sctp_skb_recv_datagram.sctp_recvmsg.inet_recvmsg
 5.554e+09 ±  3%     +20.2%  6.679e+09 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
      0.48            -0.1        0.37        perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
  27633900 ±  2%      -9.7%   24960530        perf-stat.i.branch-misses
   7520666 ±  3%     +26.9%    9545462 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.cache-misses
 7.246e+08 ±  3%     +21.5%  8.805e+08 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.cache-references
    899481 ±  3%     +24.6%    1120839 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.context-switches
      1.18            -1.9%       1.16        perf-stat.i.cpi
 3.456e+10 ±  3%     +18.9%  4.111e+10        perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
    376.24            +3.5%     389.52        perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations
      4676            -6.5%       4374 ±  4%  perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
 2.928e+10 ±  3%     +21.0%  3.542e+10 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.instructions
      0.85            +1.9%       0.86        perf-stat.i.ipc
      4.68 ±  3%     +24.7%       5.84 ±  2%  perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
      0.50            -0.1        0.37        perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
      1.18            -1.7%       1.16        perf-stat.overall.cpi
      4598            -6.1%       4315 ±  3%  perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
      0.85            +1.7%       0.86        perf-stat.overall.ipc
 5.536e+09 ±  3%     +20.2%  6.657e+09 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
  27543972 ±  2%      -9.7%   24877296        perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
   7492755 ±  3%     +26.9%    9510891 ±  4%  perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
 7.222e+08 ±  3%     +21.5%  8.776e+08 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.cache-references
    896552 ±  3%     +24.6%    1117213 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.context-switches
 3.445e+10 ±  3%     +18.9%  4.097e+10        perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
    374.91            +3.5%     388.20        perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations
 2.918e+10 ±  3%     +21.0%   3.53e+10 ±  2%  perf-stat.ps.instructions
 8.832e+12 ±  3%     +21.0%  1.069e+13        perf-stat.total.instructions





Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


                 reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202504211337.3c954295-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=amit.shah@amd.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.