All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@rub.de>,
	Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@linux.ibm.com>,
	Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
	Jiayuan Chen <mrpre@163.com>,
	Matan Shachnai <m.shachnai@gmail.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf, arm64, powerpc: Add bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1/v4()
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:26:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202504212030.IF1SLhz6-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250421091802.3234859-6-luis.gerhorst@fau.de>

Hi Luis,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 8582d9ab3efdebb88e0cd8beed8e0b9de76443e7]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Luis-Gerhorst/selftests-bpf-Fix-caps-for-__xlated-jited_unpriv/20250421-175926
base:   8582d9ab3efdebb88e0cd8beed8e0b9de76443e7
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250421091802.3234859-6-luis.gerhorst%40fau.de
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf, arm64, powerpc: Add bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1/v4()
config: arm-randconfig-001-20250421 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250421/202504212030.IF1SLhz6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250421/202504212030.IF1SLhz6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504212030.IF1SLhz6-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/bpf/core.c:3037:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    3037 | bool __weak bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1(void)
         |             ^
   kernel/bpf/core.c:3037:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
    3037 | bool __weak bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1(void)
         | ^
         | static 
>> kernel/bpf/core.c:3042:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
    3042 | bool __weak bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void)
         |             ^
   kernel/bpf/core.c:3042:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
    3042 | bool __weak bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void)
         | ^
         | static 
   2 warnings generated.


vim +/bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1 +3037 kernel/bpf/core.c

  3031	
  3032	/* By default, enable the verifier's mitigations against Spectre v1 and v4 for
  3033	 * all archs. The value returned must not change at runtime as there is
  3034	 * currently no support for reloading programs that were loaded without
  3035	 * mitigations.
  3036	 */
> 3037	bool __weak bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1(void)
  3038	{
  3039		return false;
  3040	}
  3041	
> 3042	bool __weak bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v4(void)
  3043	{
  3044		return false;
  3045	}
  3046	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-21 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-21  9:17 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/11] bpf: Mitigate Spectre v1 using barriers Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] selftests/bpf: Fix caps for __xlated/jited_unpriv Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/11] bpf: Move insn if/else into do_check_insn() Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/11] bpf: Return -EFAULT on misconfigurations Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/11] bpf: Return -EFAULT on internal errors Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/11] bpf, arm64, powerpc: Add bpf_jit_bypass_spec_v1/v4() Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21 12:26   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-04-21 13:17   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-21 14:22     ` Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/11] bpf, arm64, powerpc: Change nospec to include v1 barrier Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21 16:24   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-26 10:54     ` Luis Gerhorst
2025-05-18 10:41   ` Hari Bathini
2025-05-19  6:59     ` Hari Bathini
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/11] bpf: Rename sanitize_stack_spill to nospec_result Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/11] bpf: Fall back to nospec for Spectre v1 Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/11] selftests/bpf: Add test for Spectre v1 mitigation Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] bpf: Allow nospec-protected var-offset stack access Luis Gerhorst
2025-04-21  9:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/11] bpf: Fall back to nospec for sanitization-failures Luis Gerhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202504212030.IF1SLhz6-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=henriette.herzog@rub.de \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
    --cc=m.shachnai@gmail.com \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mrpre@163.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=skb99@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.