From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jhs@mojatatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, toke@redhat.com,
gerrard.tai@starlabs.sg, pctammela@mojatatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/5] net_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:44:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250422174406.38cc5155@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416102427.3219655-2-victor@mojatatu.com>
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 07:24:23 -0300 Victor Nogueira wrote:
> +static bool cl_is_initialised(struct drr_class *cl)
cl_is_active() ?
Had to look at the code to figure out what it does, but doesn't seem to
have much to do with being "initialised". The point is that the list
node of this class is not on the list of active classes.
> + return !list_empty(&cl->alist);
> +}
> +
> static struct drr_class *drr_find_class(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 classid)
> {
> struct drr_sched *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
> @@ -357,7 +362,7 @@ static int drr_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch,
> return err;
> }
>
> - if (first) {
> + if (first && !cl_is_initialised(cl)) {
I think we can delete the "first" check and temp variable.
The code under the if() does not touch the packet so it doesn't matter
whether we execute it for the initial or the nested call, right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 10:24 [PATCH net v2 0/5] net_sched: Adapt qdiscs for reentrant enqueue cases Victor Nogueira
2025-04-16 10:24 ` [PATCH net v2 1/5] net_sched: drr: Fix double list add in class with netem as child qdisc Victor Nogueira
2025-04-23 0:44 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-23 14:41 ` Victor Nogueira
2025-04-16 10:24 ` [PATCH net v2 2/5] net_sched: hfsc: Fix a UAF vulnerability " Victor Nogueira
2025-04-16 10:24 ` [PATCH net v2 3/5] net_sched: ets: Fix double list add " Victor Nogueira
2025-04-16 10:24 ` [PATCH net v2 4/5] net_sched: qfq: " Victor Nogueira
2025-04-16 10:24 ` [PATCH net v2 5/5] selftests: tc-testing: Add TDC tests that exercise reentrant enqueue behaviour Victor Nogueira
2025-04-17 16:07 ` [PATCH net v2 0/5] net_sched: Adapt qdiscs for reentrant enqueue cases Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-17 21:49 ` Victor Nogueira
2025-04-22 11:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-17 19:23 ` Cong Wang
2025-04-17 22:13 ` Victor Nogueira
2025-04-22 11:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-04-23 20:50 ` Cong Wang
2025-04-23 23:29 ` Cong Wang
2025-04-24 0:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-24 15:22 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2025-04-24 15:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250422174406.38cc5155@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gerrard.tai@starlabs.sg \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pctammela@mojatatu.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=victor@mojatatu.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.