All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: broonie@kernel.org,catalin.marinas@arm.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,james.clark@linaro.org,james.morse@arm.com,kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,maz@kernel.org,oleg@redhat.com,oliver.upton@linux.dev,suzuki.poulose@arm.com,tabba@google.com,will@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:43:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025042254-travesty-reprint-cba2@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404-stable-sve-6-1-v1-11-cd5c9eb52d49@kernel.org>


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps

to the 6.1-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.1 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


From broonie@kernel.org Fri Apr  4 15:28:05 2025
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:23:44 +0100
Subject: KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,  Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,  James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,  Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,  Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,  Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,  Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org,  Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20250404-stable-sve-6-1-v1-11-cd5c9eb52d49@kernel.org>

From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 2fd5b4b0e7b440602455b79977bfa64dea101e6c ]

Similar to VHE, calculate the value of cptr_el2 from scratch on
activate traps. This removes the need to store cptr_el2 in every
vcpu structure. Moreover, some traps, such as whether the guest
owns the fp registers, need to be set on every vcpu run.

Reported-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Fixes: 5294afdbf45a ("KVM: arm64: Exclude FP ownership from kvm_vcpu_arch")
Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216105057.579031-13-tabba@google.com
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |    1 -
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c    |   15 ---------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c  |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	/* Values of trap registers for the guest. */
 	u64 hcr_el2;
 	u64 mdcr_el2;
-	u64 cptr_el2;
 
 	/* Values of trap registers for the host before guest entry. */
 	u64 mdcr_el2_host;
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1234,7 +1234,6 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init
 	}
 
 	vcpu_reset_hcr(vcpu);
-	vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 = CPTR_EL2_DEFAULT;
 
 	/*
 	 * Handle the "start in power-off" case.
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64pfr0(stru
 	const u64 feature_ids = pvm_read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1);
 	u64 hcr_set = HCR_RW;
 	u64 hcr_clear = 0;
-	u64 cptr_set = 0;
 
 	/* Protected KVM does not support AArch32 guests. */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_EL0),
@@ -44,16 +43,10 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64pfr0(stru
 	/* Trap AMU */
 	if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU), feature_ids)) {
 		hcr_clear |= HCR_AMVOFFEN;
-		cptr_set |= CPTR_EL2_TAM;
 	}
 
-	/* Trap SVE */
-	if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SVE), feature_ids))
-		cptr_set |= CPTR_EL2_TZ;
-
 	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 |= hcr_set;
 	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~hcr_clear;
-	vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 |= cptr_set;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -83,7 +76,6 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64dfr0(stru
 	const u64 feature_ids = pvm_read_id_reg(vcpu, SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
 	u64 mdcr_set = 0;
 	u64 mdcr_clear = 0;
-	u64 cptr_set = 0;
 
 	/* Trap/constrain PMU */
 	if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), feature_ids)) {
@@ -110,13 +102,8 @@ static void pvm_init_traps_aa64dfr0(stru
 	if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_TraceFilt), feature_ids))
 		mdcr_set |= MDCR_EL2_TTRF;
 
-	/* Trap Trace */
-	if (!FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_TraceVer), feature_ids))
-		cptr_set |= CPTR_EL2_TTA;
-
 	vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= mdcr_set;
 	vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 &= ~mdcr_clear;
-	vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 |= cptr_set;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -167,8 +154,6 @@ static void pvm_init_trap_regs(struct kv
 	/* Clear res0 and set res1 bits to trap potential new features. */
 	vcpu->arch.hcr_el2 &= ~(HCR_RES0);
 	vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 &= ~(MDCR_EL2_RES0);
-	vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 |= CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES1;
-	vcpu->arch.cptr_el2 &= ~(CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES0);
 }
 
 /*
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c
@@ -36,23 +36,39 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, kvm_hyp_ve
 
 extern void kvm_nvhe_prepare_backtrace(unsigned long fp, unsigned long pc);
 
-static void __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void __activate_cptr_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	u64 val;
+	u64 val = CPTR_EL2_TAM;	/* Same bit irrespective of E2H */
 
-	___activate_traps(vcpu);
-	__activate_traps_common(vcpu);
+	/* !hVHE case upstream */
+	if (1) {
+		val |= CPTR_EL2_TTA | CPTR_NVHE_EL2_RES1;
+
+		/*
+		 * Always trap SME since it's not supported in KVM.
+		 * TSM is RES1 if SME isn't implemented.
+		 */
+		val |= CPTR_EL2_TSM;
 
-	val = vcpu->arch.cptr_el2;
-	val |= CPTR_EL2_TTA | CPTR_EL2_TAM;
-	if (!guest_owns_fp_regs(vcpu)) {
-		val |= CPTR_EL2_TFP | CPTR_EL2_TZ;
-		__activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
+		if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) || !guest_owns_fp_regs(vcpu))
+			val |= CPTR_EL2_TZ;
+
+		if (!guest_owns_fp_regs(vcpu))
+			val |= CPTR_EL2_TFP;
 	}
-	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_SME))
-		val |= CPTR_EL2_TSM;
+
+	if (!guest_owns_fp_regs(vcpu))
+		__activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
 
 	write_sysreg(val, cptr_el2);
+}
+
+static void __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	___activate_traps(vcpu);
+	__activate_traps_common(vcpu);
+	__activate_cptr_traps(vcpu);
+
 	write_sysreg(__this_cpu_read(kvm_hyp_vector), vbar_el2);
 
 	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT)) {


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from broonie@kernel.org are

queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-remove-host-fpsimd-saving-for-non-protected-kvm.patch
queue-6.1/spi-cadence-qspi-fix-probe-on-am62a-lp-sk.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-qdsp6-q6asm-dai-fix-q6asm_dai_compr_set_params-error-path.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-qdsp6-q6apm-dai-fix-capture-pipeline-overruns.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-mark-some-header-functions-as-inline.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-eagerly-switch-zcr_el-1-2.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-unconditionally-save-flush-host-fpsimd-sve-sme-state.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-amd-add-dmi-quirk-for-acp6x-mic-support.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-refactor-exit-handlers.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-qdsp6-q6apm-dai-set-10-ms-period-and-buffer-alignment.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-codecs-lpass-wsa-macro-fix-vi-feedback-rate.patch
queue-6.1/arm64-fpsimd-track-the-saved-fpsimd-state-type-separately-to-tif_sve.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.zen.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-remove-vhe-host-restore-of-cpacr_el1.smen.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-fsl_audmix-register-card-device-depends-on-dais.patch
queue-6.1/arm64-fpsimd-have-kvm-explicitly-say-which-fp-registers-to-save.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-discard-any-sve-state-when-entering-kvm-guests.patch
queue-6.1/arm64-fpsimd-stop-using-tif_sve-to-manage-register-saving-in-kvm.patch
queue-6.1/asoc-codecs-lpass-wsa-macro-fix-logic-of-enabling-vi-channels.patch
queue-6.1/kvm-arm64-calculate-cptr_el2-traps-on-activating-traps.patch

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-22  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-04 13:23 [6.1 PATCH RESEND 00/12] KVM: arm64: Backport of SVE fixes to v6.1 Mark Brown
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 01/12] KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 02/12] arm64/fpsimd: Track the saved FPSIMD state type separately to TIF_SVE Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "arm64/fpsimd: Track the saved FPSIMD state type separately to TIF_SVE" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 03/12] arm64/fpsimd: Have KVM explicitly say which FP registers to save Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "arm64/fpsimd: Have KVM explicitly say which FP registers to save" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 04/12] arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 05/12] KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Unconditionally save+flush host FPSIMD/SVE/SME state" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 06/12] KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:58   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove host FPSIMD saving for non-protected KVM" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 07/12] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.ZEN" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 08/12] KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:58   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Remove VHE host restore of CPACR_EL1.SMEN" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 09/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:58   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Refactor exit handlers" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 10/12] KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Mark some header functions as inline" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 11/12] KVM: arm64: Calculate cptr_el2 traps on activating traps Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` gregkh [this message]
2025-04-04 13:23 ` [PATCH RESEND 6.1 12/12] KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2} Mark Brown
2025-04-05 11:57   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-22  6:43   ` Patch "KVM: arm64: Eagerly switch ZCR_EL{1,2}" has been added to the 6.1-stable tree gregkh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2025042254-travesty-reprint-cba2@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.