Re: [PATCH net] vxlan: vnifilter: Fix unlocked deletion of default FDB entry

[Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:51:31 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I only noticed this issue after the recent VXLAN patches
> were applied to net-next. There will be a conflict when merging net into
> net-next, but resolution is trivial. Reference:
> https://github.com/idosch/linux/commit/ed95370ec89cccbf784d5ef5ea4b6fb6fa0daf47.patch

Thanks! I guess this shouldn't happen often but FWIW for conflict-less
build breakage a patch on top of the merge would be more convenient
than the net-next version of the patch. Like this:

diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
index 81d088c2f8dc..39b446a4bad7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_vnifilter.c
@@ -628,7 +628,7 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
 		u32 hash_index = fdb_head_index(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
 						vninode->vni);
 
-		spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+		spin_lock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock);
 		__vxlan_fdb_delete(vxlan, all_zeros_mac,
 				   (vxlan_addr_any(&vninode->remote_ip) ?
 				   dst->remote_ip : vninode->remote_ip),
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static void vxlan_vni_delete_group(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
 				   vninode->vni, vninode->vni,
 				   dst->remote_ifindex,
 				   true);
-		spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock[hash_index]);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&vxlan->hash_lock);
 	}
 
 	if (vxlan->dev->flags & IFF_UP) {
-- 
2.49.0