From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/7] netfilter: Exclude LEGACY TABLES on PREEMPT_RT.
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 16:49:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250423144914.GA7214@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250423140654.GD7371@breakpoint.cc>
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> I can have a look, likely there needs to a a patch before this one
> that adds a few explicit CONFIG_ entries rather than replying on
> implicit =y|m.
Pablo, whats the test suite expectation?
The netfilter tests pass when iptables is iptables-nft, but not
when iptables is iptables-legacy.
I can either patch them and replace iptables with iptables-nft
everywhere or I an update config so that iptables-legacy works too.
Unless you feel different, I will go with b) and add the needed
legacy config options.
net tests are a different issue, they fail regardless of iptables-nft or
legacy, looking at that now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-23 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 20:23 [PATCH net-next 0/7] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 1/7] netfilter: xt_IDLETIMER: convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 2/7] netfilter: xt_cgroup: Make it independent from net_cls Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: cgroup: Guard users of sock_cgroup_classid() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] netfilter: Exclude LEGACY TABLES on PREEMPT_RT Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-23 14:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-23 14:06 ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-23 14:49 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-04-23 21:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 5/7] netfilter: conntrack: Remove redundant NFCT_ALIGN call Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 6/7] docs: tproxy: fix formatting for nft code block Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-22 20:23 ` [PATCH net-next 7/7] netfilter: nf_tables: export set count and backend name to userspace Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-24 21:14 [PATCH net-next,v2 0/7] Netfilter updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-04-24 21:14 ` [PATCH net-next 4/7] netfilter: Exclude LEGACY TABLES on PREEMPT_RT Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250423144914.GA7214@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.