From: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
To: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>, <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
<mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <harry.wentland@amd.com>,
Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Correct Write_Status_Update_Request handling
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:07:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424030734.873693-2-Wayne.Lin@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424030734.873693-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
[Why]
Notice few problems under I2C-write-over-Aux with
Write_Status_Update_Request flag set cases:
- I2C-write-over-Aux request with
Write_Status_Update_Request flag set won't get sent
upon the reply of I2C_ACK|AUX_ACK followed by “M”
Value. Now just set the flag but won't send out
- The I2C-over-Aux request command with
Write_Status_Update_Request flag set is incorrect.
Should be "SYNC->COM3:0 (= 0110)|0000-> 0000|0000->
0|7-bit I2C address (the same as the last)-> STOP->".
Address only transaction without length and data.
- Upon I2C_DEFER|AUX_ACK Reply for I2C-read-over-Aux,
soure should repeat the identical I2C-read-over-AUX
transaction with the same LEN value. Not with
Write_Status_Update_Request set.
[How]
Refer to DP v2.1: 2.11.7.1.5.3 & 2.11.7.1.5.4
- Clean aux msg buffer and size when constructing
write status update request.
- Send out Write_Status_Update_Request upon reply of
I2C_ACK|AUX_ACK followed by “M”
- Send Write_Status_Update_Request upon I2C_DEFER|AUX_ACK
reply only when the request is I2C-write-over-Aux.
Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain partial I2C_WRITE requests")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
index 6ee51003de3c..28f0708c3b27 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1631,6 +1631,12 @@ static void drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
msg->request &= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Address only transaction
+ */
+ msg->buffer = NULL;
+ msg->size = 0;
}
#define AUX_PRECHARGE_LEN 10 /* 10 to 16 */
@@ -1797,10 +1803,22 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_ACK:
/*
* Both native ACK and I2C ACK replies received. We
- * can assume the transfer was successful.
+ * can't assume the transfer was completed. Both I2C
+ * WRITE/READ request may get I2C ack reply with partially
+ * completion. We have to continue to poll for the
+ * completion of the request.
*/
- if (ret != msg->size)
- drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(msg);
+ if (ret != msg->size) {
+ drm_dbg_kms(aux->drm_dev,
+ "%s: I2C partially ack (result=%d, size=%zu)\n",
+ aux->name, ret, msg->size);
+ if (!(msg->request & DP_AUX_I2C_READ)) {
+ usleep_range(AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL, AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL + 100);
+ drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(msg);
+ }
+
+ continue;
+ }
return ret;
case DP_AUX_I2C_REPLY_NACK:
@@ -1819,7 +1837,8 @@ static int drm_dp_i2c_do_msg(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
if (defer_i2c < 7)
defer_i2c++;
usleep_range(AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL, AUX_RETRY_INTERVAL + 100);
- drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(msg);
+ if (!(msg->request & DP_AUX_I2C_READ))
+ drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(msg);
continue;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 3:07 [PATCH 0/2] Fix I2C-Over-AUX handling Wayne Lin
2025-04-24 3:07 ` Wayne Lin [this message]
2025-04-25 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Correct Write_Status_Update_Request handling Ville Syrjälä
2025-04-27 9:47 ` Lin, Wayne
2025-04-24 3:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Add handling for partially read under I2-readC-over-AUX Wayne Lin
2025-04-24 5:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix I2C-Over-AUX handling Lin, Wayne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424030734.873693-2-Wayne.Lin@amd.com \
--to=wayne.lin@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=harry.wentland@amd.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.