From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
dsahern@kernel.org, makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com, phil@nwl.cc
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V6 2/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 07:23:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424072352.18aa0df1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174549940981.608169.4363875844729313831.stgit@firesoul>
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:56:49 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> + case NETDEV_TX_BUSY:
> + /* If a qdisc is attached to our virtual device, returning
> + * NETDEV_TX_BUSY is allowed.
> + */
> + txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, rxq);
> +
> + if (qdisc_txq_has_no_queue(txq)) {
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + goto drop;
> + }
> + netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
> + /* Restore Eth hdr pulled by dev_forward_skb/eth_type_trans */
> + __skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
> + /* Depend on prior success packets started NAPI consumer via
> + * __veth_xdp_flush(). Cancel TXQ stop if consumer stopped,
> + * paired with empty check in veth_poll().
> + */
> + if (unlikely(__ptr_ring_empty(&rq->xdp_ring)))
> + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
Looks like I wrote a reply to v5 but didn't hit send. But I may have
set v5 to Changes Requested because of it :S Here is my comment:
I think this is missing a memory barrier. When drivers do this dance
there's usually a barrier between stop and recheck, to make sure the
stop is visible before we check. And vice versa veth_xdp_rcv() needs
to make sure other side sees the "empty" indication before it checks
if the queue is stopped.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 12:56 [PATCH net-next V6 0/2] veth: qdisc backpressure and qdisc check refactor Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 12:56 ` [PATCH net-next V6 1/2] net: sched: generalize check for no-queue qdisc on TX queue Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 12:56 ` [PATCH net-next V6 2/2] veth: apply qdisc backpressure on full ptr_ring to reduce TX drops Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 14:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-04-24 15:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-04-24 15:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-25 13:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424072352.18aa0df1@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.