From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify calls to nvif_event_block()
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:02:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424130254.42046-4-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424130254.42046-2-phasta@kernel.org>
nouveau_fence_signal() returns a de-facto boolean to indicate when
nvif_event_block() shall be called.
The code can be made more compact and readable by calling
nvif_event_block() in nouveau_fence_update() directly.
Make those calls in nouveau_fence.c more canonical.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 31 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
index 761c174cb286..2b79bcb7da16 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ nouveau_fctx(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
return container_of(fence->base.lock, struct nouveau_fence_chan, lock);
}
-static int
+static bool
nouveau_fence_signal(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
{
- int drop = 0;
+ bool drop = false;
dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->base);
list_del(&fence->head);
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ nouveau_fence_signal(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx = nouveau_fctx(fence);
if (!--fctx->notify_ref)
- drop = 1;
+ drop = true;
}
dma_fence_put(&fence->base);
@@ -125,21 +125,23 @@ nouveau_fence_context_free(struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx)
kref_put(&fctx->fence_ref, nouveau_fence_context_put);
}
-static int
+static void
nouveau_fence_update(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx)
{
struct nouveau_fence *fence, *tmp;
- int drop = 0;
+ bool drop = false;
u32 seq = fctx->read(chan);
list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, tmp, &fctx->pending, head) {
if ((int)(seq - fence->base.seqno) < 0)
break;
- drop |= nouveau_fence_signal(fence);
+ if (nouveau_fence_signal(fence))
+ drop = true;
}
- return drop;
+ if (drop)
+ nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
}
static void
@@ -150,18 +152,13 @@ nouveau_fence_uevent_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct nouveau_channel *chan;
struct nouveau_fence *fence;
unsigned long flags;
- int drop = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
fence = list_first_entry_or_null(&fctx->pending, typeof(*fence), head);
if (fence) {
chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
- if (nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
- drop = 1;
+ nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx);
}
- if (drop)
- nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
}
@@ -241,9 +238,7 @@ nouveau_fence_emit(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
- nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
-
+ nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx);
list_add_tail(&fence->head, &fctx->pending);
spin_unlock_irq(&fctx->lock);
}
@@ -265,8 +260,8 @@ nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
- if (chan && nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
- nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
+ if (chan)
+ nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
}
return dma_fence_is_signaled(&fence->base);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 13:02 [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence.c Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/nouveau: nouveau_fence: Standardize list iterations Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence_done() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-28 14:43 ` Christian König
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: Check dma_fence in canonical way Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:24 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-24 13:25 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-28 14:45 ` Christian König
2025-05-08 9:13 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-08 9:54 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 14:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence.c Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424130254.42046-4-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.