From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@google.com>
Cc: mathias.nyman@intel.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
sumit.garg@kernel.org, gargaditya08@live.com, kekrby@gmail.com,
jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com, quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
broonie@kernel.org, quic_wcheng@quicinc.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] usb: add apis for offload usage tracking
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:12:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025042540-implode-yelp-b8e5@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416144917.16822-3-guanyulin@google.com>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:43:02PM +0000, Guan-Yu Lin wrote:
> Introduce offload_usage and corresponding apis to track offload usage
> on each USB device. Offload denotes that there is another co-processor
> accessing the USB device via the same USB host controller. To optimize
> power usage, it's essential to monitor whether the USB device is
> actively used by other co-processor. This information is vital when
> determining if a USB device can be safely suspended during system power
> state transitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guan-Yu Lin <guanyulin@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/core/usb.c | 1 +
> drivers/usb/host/Kconfig | 11 ++++
> include/linux/usb.h | 17 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
> index 460d4dde5994..76372690add0 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
> @@ -2036,6 +2036,115 @@ int usb_disable_usb2_hardware_lpm(struct usb_device *udev)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_XHCI_SIDEBAND_SUSPEND)
> +
> +/**
> + * usb_offload_get - increment the offload_usage of a USB device
> + * @udev: the USB device to increment its offload_usage
> + *
> + * Incrementing the offload_usage of a usb_device indicates that offload is
> + * enabled on this usb_device; that is, another entity is actively handling USB
> + * transfers. This information allows the USB driver to adjust its power
> + * management policy based on offload activity.
> + *
> + * The caller must hold @udev's device lock.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success. A negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int usb_offload_get(struct usb_device *udev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (udev->state == USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED ||
> + udev->state == USB_STATE_SUSPENDED)
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + /*
> + * offload_usage could only be modified when the device is active, since
> + * it will alter the suspend flow of the device.
> + */
> + ret = usb_autoresume_device(udev);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + udev->offload_usage++;
> + usb_autosuspend_device(udev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_offload_get);
> +
> +/**
> + * usb_offload_put - drop the offload_usage of a USB device
> + * @udev: the USB device to drop its offload_usage
> + *
> + * The inverse operation of usb_offload_get, which drops the offload_usage of
> + * a USB device. This information allows the USB driver to adjust its power
> + * management policy based on offload activity.
> + *
> + * The caller must hold @udev's device lock.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success. A negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int usb_offload_put(struct usb_device *udev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (udev->state == USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED ||
> + udev->state == USB_STATE_SUSPENDED)
> + return -EAGAIN;
What's to prevent the state of the device from changing right after you
check for this?
And why -EAGAIN, you don't mention that in the comment for the function.
Also, to pile on, sorry, the coding style needs to be fixed up here :)
> +
> + /*
> + * offload_usage could only be modified when the device is active, since
> + * it will alter the suspend flow of the device.
> + */
> + ret = usb_autoresume_device(udev);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Drop the count when it wasn't 0, ignore the operation otherwise. */
> + if (udev->offload_usage)
> + udev->offload_usage--;
> + usb_autosuspend_device(udev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_offload_put);
> +
> +/**
> + * usb_offload_check - check offload activities on a USB device
> + * @udev: the USB device to check its offload activity.
> + *
> + * Check if there are any offload activity on the USB device right now. This
> + * information could be used for power management or other forms of resource
> + * management.
> + *
> + * The caller must hold @udev's device lock.
> + *
> + * Returns true on any offload activity, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool usb_offload_check(struct usb_device *udev)
> +{
> + struct usb_device *child;
> + bool active;
> + int port1;
> +
> + usb_hub_for_each_child(udev, port1, child) {
No locking is needed for this loop at all? What happens if a device is
added or removed while it is looping?
> + device_lock(&child->dev);
> + active = usb_offload_check(child);
> + device_unlock(&child->dev);
> + if (active)
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return !!udev->offload_usage;
But the state can change right afterwards, so no one can do anything
with this value, right? What is is used for?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 14:43 [PATCH v12 0/4] Support system sleep with offloaded usb transfers Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-16 14:43 ` [PATCH v12 1/4] usb: xhci-plat: separate dev_pm_ops for each pm_event Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-16 14:43 ` [PATCH v12 2/4] usb: add apis for offload usage tracking Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-25 11:12 ` Greg KH [this message]
2025-05-16 4:45 ` Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-16 14:43 ` [PATCH v12 3/4] xhci: sideband: add api to trace sideband usage Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-25 11:14 ` Greg KH
2025-05-15 11:28 ` Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-16 14:43 ` [PATCH v12 4/4] usb: host: enable USB offload during system sleep Guan-Yu Lin
2025-04-25 11:15 ` Greg KH
2025-05-15 10:37 ` Guan-Yu Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025042540-implode-yelp-b8e5@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gargaditya08@live.com \
--cc=guanyulin@google.com \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kekrby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=quic_wcheng@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.