All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.6 07/10] bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
Date: Thu,  1 May 2025 15:10:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250501090913-3d681020742e8e70@stable.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250430081955.49927-8-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 1a4607ffba35bf2a630aab299e34dd3f6e658d70

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Shung-Hsi Yu<shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Commit author: Eduard Zingerman<eddyz87@gmail.com>

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.14.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 1c2244437f9a)

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  1a4607ffba35b ! 1:  ab43ca5545f85 bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
    @@ Metadata
      ## Commit message ##
         bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers
     
    +    commit 1a4607ffba35bf2a630aab299e34dd3f6e658d70 upstream.
    +
         Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate
         packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call
         invalidates packet pointers.
    @@ Commit message
         Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
         Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-8-eddyz87@gmail.com
         Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
    +    [ shung-hsi.yu: drop changes to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
    +    because it is not present. ]
    +    Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
     
      ## net/core/filter.c ##
     @@ net/core/filter.c: bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
    @@ net/core/filter.c: bool bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
      		return true;
      	default:
      		return false;
    -
    - ## tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c ##
    -@@ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c: int subprog_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
    - 
    - 	__sink(skb);
    - 	__sink(ret);
    -+	/* let verifier know that 'subprog_tc' can change pointers to skb->data */
    -+	bpf_skb_change_proto(skb, 0, 0);
    - 	return ret;
    - }
    - 
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.12.y       |  Success    |  Success   |

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-01 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-30  8:19 [PATCH stable 6.6 00/10] bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 01/10] bpf: add find_containing_subprog() utility function Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 19:09   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 02/10] bpf: refactor bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data to use helper number Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 18:51   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 03/10] bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 18:51   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 04/10] selftests/bpf: test for changing packet data from " Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 19:11   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 05/10] bpf: check changes_pkt_data property for extension programs Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 18:50   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 06/10] selftests/bpf: freplace tests for tracking of changes_packet_data Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 18:51   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 07/10] bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 19:10   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 08/10] selftests/bpf: validate that tail call invalidates " Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 19:10   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 09/10] bpf: fix null dereference when computing changes_pkt_data of prog w/o subprogs Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 18:52   ` Sasha Levin
2025-04-30  8:19 ` [PATCH stable 6.6 10/10] selftests/bpf: extend changes_pkt_data with cases w/o subprograms Shung-Hsi Yu
2025-05-01 19:10   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250501090913-3d681020742e8e70@stable.kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.