From: "Milan P. Stanić" <mps@arvanta.net>
To: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
Subject: build of erofs-utils 1.8.6 fails with musl libc
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:11:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250506121102.GA15164@m1pro.arvanta.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2348 bytes --]
Hi,
I'm maintainer of erofs-utils for Alpine linux, distribution which use
musl libc instead of glibc.
Building version 1.8.6 gives error:
------------------
Making all in contrib
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mps/aports/community/erofs-utils/src/erofs-utils-1.8.6/contrib'
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DNDEBUG -Wall -I../include -Os -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fno-plt -MT stress-stress.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/stress-stress.Tpo -c -o stress-stress.o `test -f 'stress.c' || echo './'`stress.c
stress.c: In function '__getdents_f':
stress.c:274:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'readdir64'; did you mean 'readdir_r'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
274 | while (readdir64(dir) != NULL)
| ^~~~~~~~~
| readdir_r
stress.c:274:31: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
274 | while (readdir64(dir) != NULL)
| ^~
stress.c: In function '__read_f':
stress.c:431:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pread64'; did you mean 'pread'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
431 | nread = pread64(fe->fd, buf, len, off);
| ^~~~~~~
| pread
stress.c: In function 'read_f':
stress.c:480:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'lseek64'; did you mean 'lseek'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
480 | fsz = lseek64(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
| ^~~~~~~
| lseek
make[2]: *** [Makefile:420: stress-stress.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/mps/aports/community/erofs-utils/src/erofs-utils-1.8.6/contrib'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:447: all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/mps/aports/community/erofs-utils/src/erofs-utils-1.8.6'
make: *** [Makefile:379: all] Error 2
>>> ERROR: erofs-utils: build failed
>>> erofs-utils: Uninstalling dependencies...
(1/19) Purging .makedepends-erofs-utils (20250506.063719)
------------------
This is because musl use readdir, pread and lseek instead of readdir64,
pread64 and lseek64.
(IMO musl does this properly)
Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> created patch with which I build
erofs-utils successfully. I'm attaching patch to this mail.
Feel free to contact me if you more information or to try some new
patches.
--
Kind regards
[-- Attachment #2: fix-read-pread-seek-64.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3413 bytes --]
diff --git a/contrib/stress.c b/contrib/stress.c
index d8def6a..0593d71 100644
--- a/contrib/stress.c
+++ b/contrib/stress.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int __getdents_f(unsigned int sn, struct fent *fe)
}
dir = fdopendir(dfd);
- while (readdir64(dir) != NULL)
+ while (readdir(dir) != NULL)
continue;
closedir(dir);
return 0;
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ static int __read_f(unsigned int sn, struct fent *fe, uint64_t filesize)
printf("%d[%u]/%u read_f: %llu bytes @ %llu of %s\n", getpid(), procid,
sn, len | 0ULL, off | 0ULL, fe->subpath);
- nread = pread64(fe->fd, buf, len, off);
+ nread = pread(fe->fd, buf, len, off);
if (nread != trimmed) {
fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u read_f: failed to read %llu bytes @ %llu of %s\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, len | 0ULL, off | 0ULL,
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static int __read_f(unsigned int sn, struct fent *fe, uint64_t filesize)
if (fe->chkfd < 0)
return 0;
- nread2 = pread64(fe->chkfd, chkbuf, len, off);
+ nread2 = pread(fe->chkfd, chkbuf, len, off);
if (nread2 <= 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u read_f: failed to check %llu bytes @ %llu of %s\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, len | 0ULL, off | 0ULL,
@@ -477,14 +477,14 @@ static int read_f(int op, unsigned int sn)
if (ret)
return ret;
- fsz = lseek64(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
+ fsz = lseek(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
if (fsz <= 0) {
if (!fsz) {
printf("%d[%u]/%u %s: zero size @ %s\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, __func__, fe->subpath);
return 0;
}
- fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u %s: lseek64 %s failed %d\n",
+ fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u %s: lseek %s failed %d\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, __func__, fe->subpath, errno);
return -errno;
}
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ static int __doscan_f(unsigned int sn, const char *op, struct fent *fe,
for (pos = 0; pos < filesize; pos += chunksize) {
ssize_t nread, nread2;
- nread = pread64(fe->fd, buf, chunksize, pos);
+ nread = pread(fe->fd, buf, chunksize, pos);
if (nread <= 0)
return -errno;
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int __doscan_f(unsigned int sn, const char *op, struct fent *fe,
if (fe->chkfd < 0)
continue;
- nread2 = pread64(fe->chkfd, chkbuf, chunksize, pos);
+ nread2 = pread(fe->chkfd, chkbuf, chunksize, pos);
if (nread2 <= 0)
return -errno;
@@ -547,14 +547,14 @@ static int doscan_f(int op, unsigned int sn)
if (ret)
return ret;
- fsz = lseek64(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
+ fsz = lseek(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
if (fsz <= 0) {
if (!fsz) {
printf("%d[%u]/%u %s: zero size @ %s\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, __func__, fe->subpath);
return 0;
}
- fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u %s: lseek64 %s failed %d\n",
+ fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u %s: lseek %s failed %d\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, __func__, fe->subpath, errno);
return -errno;
}
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int doscan_aligned_f(int op, unsigned int sn)
ret = tryopen(sn, __func__, fe);
if (ret)
return ret;
- fsz = lseek64(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
+ fsz = lseek(fe->fd, 0, SEEK_END);
if (fsz <= psz) {
if (fsz >= 0) {
printf("%d[%u]/%u %s: size too small %lld @ %s\n",
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int doscan_aligned_f(int op, unsigned int sn)
fe->subpath);
return 0;
}
- fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u %s: lseek64 %s failed %d\n",
+ fprintf(stderr, "%d[%u]/%u %s: lseek %s failed %d\n",
getpid(), procid, sn, __func__, fe->subpath, errno);
return -errno;
}
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 12:11 Milan P. Stanić [this message]
2025-05-06 12:38 ` build of erofs-utils 1.8.6 fails with musl libc Gao Xiang
2025-05-07 8:50 ` [PATCH] erofs-utils: fix build failure " Gao Xiang
2025-05-07 13:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Gao Xiang
2025-05-07 16:35 ` Natanael Copa
2025-05-10 9:02 ` Milan P. Stanić
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250506121102.GA15164@m1pro.arvanta.net \
--to=mps@arvanta.net \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ncopa@alpinelinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.