From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: Make nvme_pci_npages_prp() __always_inline
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 08:59:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507065913.GA31959@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202505062255.130383D3B7@keescook>
On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 10:55:31PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 06:47:54AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 08:35:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The only reason nvme_pci_npages_prp() could be used as a compile-time
> > > known result in BUILD_BUG_ON() is because the compiler was always choosing
> > > to inline the function. Under special circumstances (sanitizer coverage
> > > functions disabled for __init functions on ARCH=um), the compiler decided
> > > to stop inlining it:
> >
> > Can we place just fix um to still force inlining inline functions instead
> > of needing these workarounds?
>
> Oh, I don't have the history here. Is there something about UM and
> forcing off inlining?
Maybe I'm misunderstandng your report, but what causes the failure
to inline?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 3:35 [PATCH] nvme-pci: Make nvme_pci_npages_prp() __always_inline Kees Cook
2025-05-07 4:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-05-07 5:55 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-07 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-05-07 15:53 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-07 16:00 ` Keith Busch
2025-05-09 4:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250507065913.GA31959@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.