Re: [net-next PATCH v1 04/15] octeontx2-af: Handle inbound inline ipsec config in AF

[Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>]

On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 10:19:18AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 06:49:45PM +0530, Tanmay Jagdale wrote:
> > From: Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>

...

> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/octeontx2/otx2_cptpf_mbox.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/octeontx2/otx2_cptpf_mbox.c
> > index 5e6f70ac35a7..222419bd5ac9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/octeontx2/otx2_cptpf_mbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/octeontx2/otx2_cptpf_mbox.c
> > @@ -326,9 +326,6 @@ static int cptpf_handle_vf_req(struct otx2_cptpf_dev *cptpf,
> >  	case MBOX_MSG_GET_KVF_LIMITS:
> >  		err = handle_msg_kvf_limits(cptpf, vf, req);
> >  		break;
> > -	case MBOX_MSG_RX_INLINE_IPSEC_LF_CFG:
> > -		err = handle_msg_rx_inline_ipsec_lf_cfg(cptpf, req);
> > -		break;
> >  
> >  	default:
> >  		err = forward_to_af(cptpf, vf, req, size);
> 
> This removes the only caller of handle_msg_rx_inline_ipsec_lf_cfg()
> Which in turn removes the only caller of rx_inline_ipsec_lf_cfg(),
> and in turn send_inline_ipsec_inbound_msg().
> 
> Those functions should be removed by the same patch that makes the changes
> above.  Which I think could be split into a separate patch from the changes
> below.

Sorry for not noticing before I sent my previous email,
but I now see that those functions are removed by the following patch.
But I do think this needs to be re-arranged a bit to avoid regressions
wrt W=1 builds.

...