All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: justin.chen@broadcom.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Justin Chen <justin.chen@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mailbox: Add support for bcm74110
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 21:34:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202505072033.soYE6U5p-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415182826.3905917-3-justin.chen@broadcom.com>

Hi,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on jassibrar-mailbox/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.15-rc5 next-20250507]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/justin-chen-broadcom-com/dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-support-for-bcm74110/20250416-125112
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jassibrar/mailbox.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250415182826.3905917-3-justin.chen%40broadcom.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] mailbox: Add support for bcm74110
config: i386-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505072033.soYE6U5p-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505072033.soYE6U5p-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505072033.soYE6U5p-lkp@intel.com/

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/mailbox/bcm74110-mailbox.c: In function 'bcm74110_rx_push_init_msg':
>> drivers/mailbox/bcm74110-mailbox.c:142:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'kzalloc' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     142 |         msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg), GFP_ATOMIC);
         |               ^~~~~~~
>> drivers/mailbox/bcm74110-mailbox.c:142:13: warning: assignment to 'struct bcm74110_mbox_msg *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
     142 |         msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg), GFP_ATOMIC);
         |             ^
   drivers/mailbox/bcm74110-mailbox.c: In function 'bcm74110_rx_pop_init_msg':
>> drivers/mailbox/bcm74110-mailbox.c:237:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'kfree' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     237 |         kfree(msg);
         |         ^~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +/kzalloc +142 drivers/mailbox/bcm74110-mailbox.c

   137	
   138	static void bcm74110_rx_push_init_msg(struct bcm74110_mbox *mbox, u32 val)
   139	{
   140		struct bcm74110_mbox_msg *msg;
   141	
 > 142		msg = kzalloc(sizeof(*msg), GFP_ATOMIC);
   143		if (!msg)
   144			return;
   145	
   146		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->list_entry);
   147		msg->msg = val;
   148	
   149		spin_lock(&mbox->rx_svc_list_lock);
   150		list_add_tail(&msg->list_entry, &mbox->rx_svc_init_list);
   151		spin_unlock(&mbox->rx_svc_list_lock);
   152	}
   153	
   154	static void bcm74110_rx_process_msg(struct bcm74110_mbox *mbox)
   155	{
   156		struct device *dev = &mbox->pdev->dev;
   157		struct bcm74110_mbox_chan *chan_priv;
   158		struct mbox_chan *chan;
   159		u32 msg, status;
   160		int type;
   161	
   162		do {
   163			msg = bcm74110_rx_readl(mbox, BCM_MBOX_RDATA);
   164			status = bcm74110_rx_readl(mbox, BCM_MBOX_STATUS0);
   165	
   166			dev_dbg(dev, "rx: [{req=%lu|rply=%lu|srv=%lu|fn=%lu|length=%lu|slot=%lu]\n",
   167				BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, REQ), BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, RPLY),
   168				BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, SVC), BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, FUNC),
   169				BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, LENGTH), BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, SLOT));
   170	
   171			type = BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg, SVC);
   172			switch (type) {
   173			case BCM_MSG_SVC_INIT:
   174				bcm74110_rx_push_init_msg(mbox, msg);
   175				break;
   176			case BCM_MSG_SVC_PMC:
   177			case BCM_MSG_SVC_SCMI:
   178			case BCM_MSG_SVC_DPFE:
   179				chan = &mbox->controller.chans[type];
   180				chan_priv = chan->con_priv;
   181				if (chan_priv->en)
   182					mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
   183				else
   184					dev_warn(dev, "Channel not enabled\n");
   185				break;
   186			default:
   187				dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported msg received\n");
   188			}
   189		} while (status & BCM_MBOX_STATUS0_NOT_EMPTY);
   190	}
   191	
   192	static irqreturn_t bcm74110_mbox_isr(int irq, void *data)
   193	{
   194		struct bcm74110_mbox *mbox = data;
   195		u32 status;
   196	
   197		status = bcm74110_irq_readl(mbox, BCM_MBOX_IRQ_STATUS);
   198	
   199		bcm74110_irq_writel(mbox, 0xffffffff, BCM_MBOX_IRQ_CLEAR);
   200	
   201		if (status & BCM_MBOX_IRQ_NOT_EMPTY)
   202			bcm74110_rx_process_msg(mbox);
   203		else
   204			dev_warn(&mbox->pdev->dev, "Spurious interrupt\n");
   205	
   206		return IRQ_HANDLED;
   207	}
   208	
   209	static void bcm74110_mbox_mask_and_clear(struct bcm74110_mbox *mbox)
   210	{
   211		bcm74110_irq_writel(mbox, 0xffffffff, BCM_MBOX_IRQ_MASK_SET);
   212		bcm74110_irq_writel(mbox, 0xffffffff, BCM_MBOX_IRQ_CLEAR);
   213	}
   214	
   215	static int bcm74110_rx_pop_init_msg(struct bcm74110_mbox *mbox, u32 func_type,
   216					    u32 *val)
   217	{
   218		struct bcm74110_mbox_msg *msg, *msg_tmp;
   219		unsigned long flags;
   220		bool found = false;
   221	
   222		spin_lock_irqsave(&mbox->rx_svc_list_lock, flags);
   223		list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, msg_tmp, &mbox->rx_svc_init_list,
   224					 list_entry) {
   225			if (BCM_MSG_GET_FIELD(msg->msg, FUNC) == func_type) {
   226				list_del(&msg->list_entry);
   227				found = true;
   228				break;
   229			}
   230		}
   231		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mbox->rx_svc_list_lock, flags);
   232	
   233		if (!found)
   234			return -EINVAL;
   235	
   236		*val = msg->msg;
 > 237		kfree(msg);
   238	
   239		return 0;
   240	}
   241	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

      reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15 18:28 [PATCH v4 0/2] mailbox: Add support for bcm74110 justin.chen
2025-04-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: " justin.chen
2025-04-17  6:25   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-04-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] " justin.chen
2025-05-07 13:34   ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202505072033.soYE6U5p-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.